Toshiro Mifune @ 100: Stray Dog
Saturday, March 28, 2020 at 8:00PM
Lynn Lee in 10|25|50|75|100, Akira Kurosawa, Asian cinema, Oscars (40s), Stray Dog, Takashi Shimura, Toshiro Mifune, film noir

Team Experience will be celebrating the Centennial of Japan's great movie star Toshiro Mifune for the next five nights. Here's Lynn Lee...

It’s impossible to think of Toshiro Mifune without thinking of Akira Kurosawa—and vice versa.  Their partnership was unparalleled in its cinematic impact, spanning 16 films between 1948 and 1965 that included stone-cold classics like Rashomon, Seven Samurai, Throne of Blood, The Hidden Fortress, and Yojimbo.  While Mifune and Kurosawa did significant work independent of each other, it’s not exaggerating to say they made each other; both men would acknowledge as much even after their falling out.  In Mifune, Kurosawa found the perfect player to convey the outsize emotions and imposing physical presence of his most memorable protagonists—typically men of strong passions and even stronger will, whether turned to honorable or horrible ends...

Stray Dog (1949), Mifune’s third collaboration with Kurosawa, is an early film in both their careers (Mifune’s seventh, Kurosawa’s ninth) and shows both of them still finding their stylistic stride and revealing why they worked so well together.

Influenced by Kurosawa’s admiration for film noir and the detective novels of Georges Simenon, it centers on a young Tokyo homicide cop, Murakami (Mifune), whose gun is pickpocketed and later used in a series of increasingly violent crimes. 

After Murakami’s initial efforts to trace and recover the gun are undercut by his own overeagerness, he’s paired with the much more experienced detective Sato (Takashi Shimura, another Kurosawa regular).  Sato teaches the rookie a thing or two about good police work before they finally catch up with the man who has the stolen gun.

Stray Dog is thus something of a proto-police procedural, as well as a forerunner of the now-ubiquitous “buddy cop” movie.  It’s a solid, well-constructed example of the genre(s), elevated by Kurosawa’s signature stylistic touches (axial cuts and wipes abound, as does his use of weather as narrative omen).  It’s far more interesting, however, as a vivid, then-contemporary portrait of post-WWII Japan under Allied occupation.  We see a society struggling with rampant poverty, inequality, and crime, as shots of ration cards and an extensive black market are juxtaposed with seedy dance clubs, zoot-suited yakuzas, and glimpses of the uninterrupted luxury of the upper classes—as well as broader cultural attempts to return to something like normalcy, perhaps best captured in a key scene that takes place at a baseball game.

But what clearly fascinated Kurosawa even more than these external markers was the internal impact of the war on the moral psychology of its survivors.  Murakami and Sato represent two different types, separated by generation in their views of moral responsibility and the moral politics of crime – Murakami’s more conflicted and ambivalent, shaped by his experience as a soldier in the war, Sato’s more cut-and-dried, driven as much by pragmatism as anything else.  Meanwhile, the main perpetrator of the crimes they’re investigating, Yusa (Isao Kimura, largely unseen until the very end), presents a third axis: where Sato acts as Murakami’s mentor and temperamental foil, Yusa—about Murakami’s own age, a war veteran like himself—is his dark doppelganger, the “stray dog” he could have become had he chosen a different path.  If that construction sounds a bit schematic, that’s because it is; Kurosawa’s script doesn’t shy away from spelling out the moral debate, both in Murakami’s discussions with Sato and his climactic showdown with Yusa. What makes it all work is the way it’s filmed and, of course, acted.

Perhaps the most striking feature of Mifune’s performance here is how comparatively restrained it is.  Striking because while there are many qualities one can attribute to Mifune in other Kurosawa films, “restrained” is generally not one of them, or at least not the first that comes to mind.  Kurosawa famously first glimpsed the actor at a Japanese studio talent search and found himself immediately “transfixed” by the spectacle of “a young man reeling around the room in a violent frenzy,” whom he likened to a “wounded beast trying to break loose,” and noted that when he had finished, Mifune sat down and gave the judges “an ominous stare.”  That raw ferocity is present in Stray Dog, but mainly by suggestion or in flashes.  You see it in the glowering intentness of Murakami’s eyes as he’s pounding the pavement of the Tokyo black market or listening to the various witnesses, or the speed with which he leaps to his feet any time he learns of a new clue or lead that he feels compelled to pursue – and, certainly, in his final, intensely physical showdown with Yusa.

But for the most part, Mifune’s Murakami is quiet, disciplined, and deferential to his superiors, even as he’s visibly racked with guilt and anxiety over the evils committed with his stolen gun.  In his light-colored suit and cap, with his deep-set eyes, clean-shaven features, and expressive but controlled countenance, he looks – and acts – like a young Gregory Peck rather than the fearsome, hard-bitten warrior he would so often play in the future.  (Shallow side note: this movie also reminds you that young Mifune was hawt, something harder to see in later Kurosawa roles where he would scowl and contort his expression so fiercely you could easily forget what it looked like in repose.)

Moreover, despite its ostensible focus on Murakami, Stray Dog is in large part a two-hander between Mifune and Shimura, who had previously offset each other effectively in Kurosawa’s Drunken Angel and would do so again in many more films.  Here, Murakami is frequently positioned as a silent observer as Sato takes the investigative lead.  To his credit, Mifune never tries to crowd Shimura out of the picture, showing commitment to a character who doesn’t really seek to challenge the existing order, even if he does question it at times.  But with that piercing gaze, and that perpetual look of tightly coiled energy just waiting to explode into action, he never fully recedes into the background, either. 

One senses “the real Mifune” was just biding his time, waiting for a chance to come out and swallow the screen.  He would get it, a couple of years later, in a little film called Rashomon.

Article originally appeared on The Film Experience (http://thefilmexperience.net/).
See website for complete article licensing information.