Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Podcast: Jane Eyre | Main | First and Last, Hello Girls »
Sunday
Mar272011

Take Three: Michael Pitt

Craig here with Take Three. Today: Michael Pitt

Take One: Hedwig and the Angry Inch (2001)
Pitt’s weedy teenage wannabe rock imp Tommy Gnosis (The Jesus freak army brat formerly known as Tommy Speck – then, very nearly, Tommy Ache) got to grapple with Hedwig’s Angry Inch in unconventionally inventive ways back in 2001. John Cameron Mitchell’s slip-up-operation rock opera, Hedwig and the Angry Inch, was like nothing else on screen at the time. If you could avert your eyes from internationally ignored “icon” Hedwig’s shining beacon of starlight, then hidden in the flared remnants, and on the sidelines, was Pitt’s Tommy. He was initially willing to dote on her every word but eventually reluctant to acknowledge his own sneaky appropriation of her back catalogue. He became the big star; Hedwig toured the fish restaurants of America.

Pitt does the naive, overtly adoring rock moppet well. He also does the non-committal, dull-eyed whiner-singer act capably, too. In short: he nailed being a half-hearted androgynous songster on the head. His game karaoke portrayal was a bizarre squishing together of Iggy Pop, Kurt Cobain and Marc Bolan and it made for a perfect contrast with Mitchell’s gender mis-reassigned glamzilla. Pitt had the “gee shucks” drippiness down to a tee early on and the moody insouciance of a fast-rising pin-up later in the film. Pitt’s occassionally been compared to Leonardo DiCaprio (they look faintly alike), but he was destined for less starry vehicles. Hedwig was his first substantial role after a few bit parts in some notable movies, setting the left of mainstream tone.

Take Two: Funny Games US (2008)
Pitt put his baby-faced Buscemi looks to ominous use in Michael Haneke’s close-to-replica  American remake of his own 1997 violent image treatise Funny Games. I’m not this particular remake’s biggest admirer, but I’ll stunt the bile flow and focus on the matter at hand, the one stand-out aspect: Pitt’s performance, which was remarkable for its blandly creepy conviction. Brady Corbet’s less assertive Peter was fine. But Pitt, as fourth-wall-breaking smiling Paul, had the film – just like the terrorised family at its centre – under his thumb with his politely negotiated terror. He was the sociopathic preppy-styled ringleader; a blond, blank-eyed menace.

Pitt brings out the duplicity innate in his character through careful use of body language and an array of insincere facial expressions (a slyness you can also see in his Murder by Numbers and Boardwalk Empire roles). Rid of his floppy-fringed slacker locks and the pouting hipster tics of other films, with hair slicked down in Aryan tidiness and his lips curled into a smug half-smile respectively, he projects just the right amount of playful goading. He fleshes out what was essentially a second-hand scolding message character. By the time he’s playing God – and, by proxy, director – by rewinding the action to fit his own murderous MO, Pitt has quite literally won his not actually all that funny game. Without him, Haneke’s lofty polemic loses something integrally dark.


Take Three
: Last Days (2005)
He certainly looked like teen spirit. And he certainly sounded like teen spirit. But whether he really, truly smelled like teen spirit is open for debate. Pitt played jaded and degraded rock icon Blake, a rather transparent stand-in for Kurt Cobain, in the third entry in Gus Van Sant’s loose death tetralogy. (Gerry, Elephant and, slightly less a part of the gang, Paranoid Park being the others.) Some folks got terribly roiled up by “their” favoured generational spokesperson being portrayed in such an irregular fashion, other folks went with Van Sant’s tonic poem and embraced his loose interpretation of a famous life self-terminated too early. Although Blake was our main focus, Pitt ensured we weren’t privy to everything his portrayal represented. I’m Not There was used for Todd Haynes’ experimental Dylan biopic, but it’s a more apt title for this portrait of rock iconicity. Or He’s Barely Audible.

Pitt achieves a lot by doing little on screen: stumbling his way around his crumbling mansion with a shotgun, mumbling his way around a conversation with a pair of Mormon callers, looking fed up when Kim Gordon pops in for a chat, playing hide-and-seek with Asia Argento, making himself scarce when Lukas Haas and co. drop by unannounced, sharing a moment of tender clarity with a mini clowder of stray kittens. He draws attention by shielding himself from us; we barely see his face. When we do see his face, it’s a blank slate - a pale, unkempt presentation of incoherent mannerisms. It’s kind of Method acting, but kind of not. (Stripped Method? Method Undone?) It's the shuffling, vaporous presence itself that makes an impact. Portrayed this way, Blake is always a scruffy enigma, there to curiously mull over or ignore as we see fit.

Thre more key films for the taking: The Dreamers (2003), The Village (2004), Silk (2007)

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

Pitt is one of my favorite actors ever since Bully he is just so effortles like he is underplaying but in a good way, I agree with your three choices but I have to ask Nathaniel have you seen him in Jailbait, hes excellent there.

March 27, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterjjablo

Personally, I loved him in Dawson's Creek.

March 27, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSam C.

I've just flipped through the channels, "The Dreamers" was on somewhere... okay, I've already seen it, too tired to watch it again... go online... then this... co-incidence???

March 27, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDominik

My favorite Michael Pitt performances were in Bully and The Dreamers. I also thought he was good in Murder By Numbers. I still haven't seen Hedwig And The Angry Inch (although I've seen Shortbus and loved it), but I want to try to watch it this year.

March 28, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMeghan

I don't know, i liked Pitt in Hedwig, but he just got blown off the screen by JCM. constantly. But considering how much of a character Hedwig is, that's not really much of a surprise. I loved Pitt's final song/performance though (even if he wasn't the one singing it).

I still have yet to watch the Dreamers, which is odd considering how much i love Eva Green.

March 28, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDerreck

The American version of Funny Games is one of the scariest films I have ever seen...I had to sleep with the lights on for a couple of nights...not that the lights would have protected me from two violent, sociopathic, psychotic killers.

And I thought Brady Corbett and Michael Pitt were equally good...Brady Corbett is an underrated actor...he deserved an Oscar nom for Mysterious Skin.

March 28, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSoSueMe

He's so bloody hot in The Dreamers. So, so, so hot. But that aside, never had much use for him as an actor until he turned up in Boardwalk Empire, in which he's a total scene stealer and maybe the most compelling actor on the show (except when Michael K. Williams shows up as Chalky). Perhaps missing the US version of Funny Games meant I missed the missing link between Pitt the (gorgeous) dull eyed non-entity and Pitt the charismatic star performer.

March 28, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRoark
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.