Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Oscar Horrors: "Max Schreck" | Main | How long can Russell Crowe hold a note? »
Thursday
Oct182012

That's Gotta Be Some Cockroach

JA from MNPP here. A wise man once said, "Aim for the flat-top!" No wait... that wasn't it. A wise man once said, "This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions... Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!" Eh close enough. The point is, much like a testy Gozarian I know, you can't keep a prehistoric bitch down. The prehistoric bitch in question, the one bringing on all the cat-on-dog stuff, is a third Ghostbusters movie. It's like the longest episode of Moonlighting ever - will they or won't they? And will Agnes DiPesto ever find love? What about Janine Melnitz, for that matter? Maybe those two should've tossed down the corded phones of their imprisonement and found sweet neurotic love together...?

I am letting this get away from me. The rumor that refuses to die, a third Ghostbusters movie, is alive again. Director Ivan Reitman is making sure his schedule's clear next Summer in order to shoot it, says Deadline. Bill Murray will of course not be involved. Unless he decides to show up on set randomly, in which case they write him in. You never know.

Anyway, I think you'll excuse me for thinking that this time the city will be attacked by the largest ever grain of salt. What do we think? Will this ever happen?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

I don't have a clue if it will happen. I know I have no interest if it does.

October 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterBrianZ

"Ghostbusters 2" was lame but if they've brought some a younger cast it might work. But isn't it a bit late to reboot this series?!

October 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJaragon

As long as Bill Murray's out, so am I.

October 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterAlex

Has Bill Murray ever said why he is opposed to a "3" ?

October 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterDavid

Jaragon -- i'm pretty sure that if they don't do a number #3 there's going to be a reboot. Hollywood can't let multimillion dollar franchises die.

October 18, 2012 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Like many of my age, Ghostbusters is a protected species and the idea of a lame and unnecessary third film (especially without Peter Venkman) is sad...unfortunately, money usually wins over dignity.

October 19, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterBurning Reels

Wouldn't it be just terrific if the memories of our youth could be left unsullied by the money whores. I used to love Tim Burton, but after he eviscerated Planet of the Apes, Alice in Wonderland and finally Dark Shadows, just thinking about watching any of his future films makes me reach for the barf bucket. Shameless.

October 19, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterbrookesboy
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.