WATCH AT HOME!
Film Bitch History
Oscar History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

 

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!
Comment Fun

Marriage Story Review

"They're saying this is for Adam Driver what Kramer vs Kramer was for Dustin Hoffman. More about him than about her.  Scarlett, to me, is the open question. By now it's Driver vs Phoenix for best actor." - Melchiades - Andrew

"Mini-shutout to Alda, whom I loved and thought did absolute wonders in his what, 3 or 4 scenes. Great review!" -Alex

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 461 Patron SaintsIf you read us daily, please be one.  Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Interviews

recent

Directors (For Sama)
Lulu Wang (The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra (Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes (Diamantino)
Jia Zhang-ke (Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Best Acting, Male Division: Personal Ballots & Oscar Charts | Main | Best of 2015: Nathaniel's Top Fifteen »
Tuesday
Jan262016

Retro Sundance: 1991's Poison

Since we're not in Sundance this year, a look back at Sundance classics. Here's David on Poison...

Glenn kicked off our Sundance retrospective with a look at Desert Hearts, a film with more than a passing resemblance to Todd Haynes' Carol; a few years down the line, and we come to Haynes’ own appearance in the Utah festival, with his feature debut Poison. Winner of the 1991 festival’s Grand Jury Prize - Dramatic, Poison is considered a vital film in the ‘New Queer Cinema’ movement of the early 1990s, as coined by B. Ruby Rich the following year. Rich’s theory involved not just the presence of LGBT characters and themes, but the queering of filmmaking form itself. Haynes had already demonstrated his inventive, radical eye in the controversial short film Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story, and Poison, with its triptych of homonymic narratives, consolidated the director’s manipulation of nostalgia and classic cinematic forms to produce a strikingly different approach to cinema.

Each segment is presented in an individual and vivid stylistic form. 'Hero', the story of a young boy who shoots his father and literally flies away, comes as an oversaturated tabloid news documentary, containing interviews with scandalised neighbours, incisively lurid narration and tremulous recreations of the event itself. [More...]

'Horror' is shot in crisp monochrome, its extreme angles increasingly claustrophobic as it apes a '60s B-movie for the story of a doctor ingesting 'pure sex drive' and turning into a murderous leper.  'Homo' echoes the erotic bodily close-ups and prison walls of Jean Genet's Un chant d'amour for the tale of an inmate attracted to a fellow prisoner he had seen bullied in a juvenile facility in their youth.

Haynes intercuts between the three narratives with increasing frequency, never presenting neighbouring scenes as connected or necessarily reflective of each other, but using the rhythms of editing to build each to a feverish climax and using their proximity to provoke tonal shifts in the audience's perception as it races to adjust to the pace. In adopting various bold stylistic forms across his career, from the Sirkian melodrama of Far From Heaven to the glam rock swirl of Velvet Goldmine, Haynes has proven adept at subverting audience preconceptions of style and content to make pure emotional connections to the contemporary world without ever overstating the currency of their social relevancy.

Much like Haynes' later feature [safe]Poison presents narratives and characters with in such perilous physical and/or emotional states that it invites but never clarifies contemporaneous subtexts; most obviously, the repercussions of the AIDS crisis and the visibility and fear of gay men as a result. Haynes' unique unions of vivid style and emotive substance have always resisted definitive readings, and so it's more satisfying to enjoy them on an instinctive, sensual level. In Poison, that impulse creates sparks from images as diverse as Homo's picaresque flashbacks, juvenile homosocialty remembered in bright Technicolor, to Horror's claustrophobic noir sequence that makes for the scientist's libidinous first kill.

The film's prologue sets these kind of perverse pleasures immediately into the audience's minds: a young boy's hand roaming curiously, sensually over a suburban grandmother's dresser, the paraphernalia of everyday female existence made into a taboo filmed to emphasise the forbidden touch. Poison is a collection of men encountering various kinds of nominal ‘sin', and how society's judgment can twist anyone into a monster, or a brute, or even an impossibly airborne mystery.

Previously on Sundance Retro: Desert Hearts, The Brave Little Toaster, and Longtime Companion

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (10)

Poison is so brilliant. I know that one day Todd Haynes will make a movie that's less than perfect, but Poison is where the 6-film winning streak starts.

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterMike in Canada

His Mildred Pierce was less than perfect.

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered Commenter/3rtful

Makes me want to see this one all over again, haven't seen it since it was released in theaters. It would make a good double bill with Haynes's Safe ('95).

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterRob

Reel Charlie's review of Poison:
https://reelcharlie.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/poison/

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterPhilip Bahr

/3rtful: True - but he can go make imperfect TV, I don't consider it an interruption to the streak.

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterMike in Canada

I feel like Poison is my favorite Todd Haynes film.

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterYavor

This is the side of Haynes I miss!

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSan FranCinema

god i haven't seen this movie in a million years. perhaps before wonderstruck arrives in a year or so we should revisit all of them.

January 26, 2016 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

The entire Haynes catalogue needs the Criterion (or equivalent) treatment - the global lack of availability of his work on blu-ray or even quality DVD packages is a dismal state of affairs. I'm really hoping that the beautiful [safe] release and all the attention Carol has garnered will result in this situation being rectified pronto! Despite the Oscar snub, it seems like there is finally more widespread consensus that Haynes is one of the most significant auteurs of our time, so please let us watch all his genius films on the high-quality formats they deserve. Having said that, one of my favourite pieces of film writing is an essay about Superstar and bootleg aesthetics and how the further disintegration of each descending generation of VHS perfectly mirrors the themes of the film...

January 27, 2016 | Unregistered Commenter7Bis

^ Yes, what 7Bis said.

January 27, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterHustler

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>