Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Happy Valentine's Day | Main | Best Part of the Grammys »
Monday
Feb142011

ASC Goes to Inception. Oscar Could Be a Nail Biter.

The American Society of Cinematographer's handed their Cinematography prize to Wally Pfister for Inception. Pfister also won the BFCA Critics Choice prize. BAFTA sided with still Oscar-less legend Roger Deakins (interview) for True Grit. Which man will take the Oscar?

Or is The King's Speech just going to win everything in a massive sweeping Royal Love-In? Even if the acting Oscar categories are relatively undramatic this year, there seem to be a few tight races behind the scenes like Best Director (Fincher or Hooper?), Art Direction (Inception or The King's Speech?), Cinematography (Inception or True Grit?) and isn't Score still a toss up but for the aforementioned love-in?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

I wish Black Swan had a chance in Cinematography, or was at least in the conversation. But having said that, I'm definitely behind Deakins. He's the best in the field.

P.S. Remember his 2007? No Country..., In the Valley of Elah, The Assassination of Jesse James...) WOW

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBryan

I totally agree with Bryan

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPeggy Sue

I think Deakins still looks good for the Oscar, considering he already has two ASCs and received a lifetime achievement award yesterday, it probably doesn't mean that much that he didn't win here.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRax

I still think this is Deakins' year. Oscar owes him big-time after the Jesse James snub and they have a habit of reward the right person at the wrong time.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterW.J.

perhaps I'm worried for nothing but it just seems like, if there's no way that Best Nominee is in the conversation, (Libatique) sieze the moment to finally reward the legend who has never won.

Rax -- good point.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNathaniel R

I just don't know if all the Academy voters are sitting there thinking Deakins is a legend, so I must vote for him. Though the popularity of True Grit is undeniable. Yet it's hard to deny Pfister's amazing work in Inception.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGabriel Oak

One other thing. Deakins name isn't on the Oscar ballot for Cinematography. It just says True Grit.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGabriel Oak

No, Pfister's work on Inception was at best a good, not great, piece of work. He's done great work (The Prestige and Memento in particular) but a cinematog win for Inception would be questionable.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

I think the main reason Deakins will win is not because of his own long career (that hasn't helped him win any so far...), but because True Grit needs to win something. It has 10 nominations. FIlm with that kind of tally generally win something by default, unless there's some sort of scandal, real or imagined (i.e. the Marty overreach in Gangs of New York, the arguable racism against The Color Purple). Cinematography's the perfect way to reward the film, since there's no other obvious nominee crying out to take it. Even if Hailee or someone else from the film wins, I think cinematography comes first, since it's the obvious choice.

February 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterAdam Keller
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.