Review: Hunger Games Catches Wispy Fire
Monday, November 25, 2013 at 11:30AM This review originally appeared in my column at Towleroad
Their clothes ignite but does the movie?
The Hunger Games is not without its charms. Which is a very strange thing to say about a beloved bloody genre franchise about children murdering each other... but then *I'm* not the one suggesting it become a family theme park or inspire a cosmetics line. (Both very sensible and in no way inappropriate spinoffs!) At the very least, as these things go, it is infinitely preferrable to the Twilight Saga. They're the immensely popular twin (non-identical) poster girls for the increasingly crowded subgenre of YA dystopian fantasies in which a mopey teen passively navigates treacherous waters (and woods) and love triangles with death looming all around her. Both series trade on grand suicidal gestures ('I'll die of depression/eat the poison berries, if I can't have my man... I swear!') but at least The Hunger Games is self aware. It performs these defiant adolescent gestures with a sly and stately sense of morbid theatricality instead of self-pitying angst and is generally smart enough to express ambivalence about its content beyond the binaries of Team This Boyfriend vs Team That Boyfriend.
Miley's guards capture Liam on the lamBut, yes, when we return to the deadly adventures of Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) for HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE she is flip-flopping between Boyfriends.
If you need a refresher it's like this: Katniss and Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) were co-victors of the last Hunger Games, a futuristic take on gladiator battles of ancient history. [more]
Each year two teenagers from each of 12 districts are dropped into a virtual colliseum if you will to kill or be killed for the amusement of the Capitol and the continued oppression of the the other 12 Districts for whom the annual games are a sick distraction and brutal punishment. There can be only one winner but through a combination of skill, luck, and a sneaky improvised sham romance which put the viewing audience on their side, Katniss and Peeta prevailed together. But secretly Katniss still loves Gale (Liam Hemsworth) back home in District 12. Will she risk it all for love or stick with the practical solution: keeping up appearances by keeping her head down with Peeta?
Costume Design by Trish Summerville (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo)
When Katniss and Peeta embark, reluctantly, on their Capitol-sponsored "Victory Tour" things don't go according to plan; they can't it's a middle franchise chapter! As tension mounts between the ruling class (led by shady Donald Sutherland) and Katniss who inspires way too much love in the restless oppressed masses, a new Games master emerges (Philip Seymour Hoffman) to cut Katniss down to size in the cruelest way possible. I won't spoil the surprises (for those who haven't read the books) but back to the Games we go with a whole new set of "tributes": hey look it's character actors Amanda Plummer and Jeffrey Wright as smart eccentric previous winners Wiress and Beetee, Jena Malone who is great great fun as axe-wielding perpetually angry Johanna and Lynn Cohen as Mags! My favorite new character was Sam Claflin's Finnick who is hunky, vain, formidable... and gay? I haven't read the books but he doesn't use pronouns when talking about his lovelife so there's that. Mostly though, he engages the imagination because he's actually a bit hard to pin down and therefore capable of surprises. That's rare for this franchise which, like Harry Potter before it, has an immediate and super lame habit of associating districts/houses with good/evil as if location alone determines one's character.
Sam Claflin as FinnickSince the Capitol is obscenely wealthy and willfully blind to or just mean-spirited about the plight of the less fortunate masses in the 12 districts it's a bit of a 1% vs 99% allegory ("it's more of an 7% vs. 93%" - nitpickers). The series is also, arguably, a riff on Capitalism as America's #1 fanatic religion with its false "winner takes all!" myth-making and a skewering of Reality TV since the drama is so forcibly manufactured for entertainment purposes from real life pain and struggle. In short there's a lot to work with for the storytellers. Whether or not The Hunger Games know's what to do with its rich if macabre world-building is another matter.
I'd argue that it doesn't. For one, despite its 146 minute length, it never really investigates that world beyond how it effects Katniss. For another, like the original film, it lacks the nerve that a premise this sick-making demands. It's got nothing on the brutality of the films that paved the way for it like Battle Royale or Series 7: The Contenders and so it can't really back up the agonizing drama that the concept requires or earn the survivors guilt that Katniss feels. Notice how Katniss doesn't really kill people (maybe one in each film?) despite being the survivor of a 24 person kill or be killed game - she defeats her enemies in often blameless ways, with fate intervening to do her dirty work lest the audience turn on her. It's very Disney, actually. "Oops, they fell to their death again!" You know how Disney villains expire so that the blood is never on the Princesses hands. She'd wipe them on her dress and that'd ruin spoil so much future merchandising revenue.
But there are a couple of things The Hunger Games does very well and nearly all of them involve the casting and Jennifer Lawrence. I'd argue that the series wouldn't work at all without a bonafide movie star as its center so they were rolling the dice a few years ago betting on Jennifer Lawrence. In the years since she's more than come through, justifying her "It" Girl success a few times over and picking up an Oscar on her way back to the Capitol. This franchise depends on you buying that Katniss, a girl who doesn't do much other than survive, would inspire the masses despite giving them virtually nothing in her public appearances besides fiery dresses and a decent backstory. For a star as lively and gif-worthy as JLaw, Katniss is even a little dull by comparison. But the mask-like stillness that Lawrence gives the heroine is a smart movie. The poor girl from District 12 becomes an ideal tabula rasa. Project your hopes and dreams on to her... she'll carry them for you and live so that your hope might not die.
My three favorite beats in the film all involve Katniss jostled from her innate stillness (which feels like a cross between concentration and catatonia, either won fully justified in this context). There are two comic beats just before the Games where she doesn't know how to react to other Tributes. One kiss throws her completely off guard and Johanna's scene-stealing combination of exhibitionism and fury in an elevator prompts even bigger laughs. It can't be a spoiler to tell you that the heroine survives and the franchise will continue for at least another couple of films. The movie ends with a superb wordless close-up of Lawrence dropping that exquisite mask, for a rare exposed look right into Katniss's inner fire. It's here, I think, that the drama finally ignites justifying the movie's title and the future rebellion to come. Yes, the end is a maddeningly late place for a movie to raise its temperature but it's a sequel awaiting a sequel so what can you do? I wish it were a cable television series instead, so we could binge-watch Katniss's next death-defying move.
Grade: B-/C+ oh I dunno. I enjoyed it but it also seemed so disposable.
Oscar Chances: Nope... unless they're itching to recognize Trish Summerville who is in demand right now after her great work on The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo and who takes over costuming duties on the franchise from 3 time Oscar nominee Judianna Makovsky
Reader Comments (15)
I enjoyed it better than the first. But I don't think it's this AMAZING movie like everyone else. And this is coming from someone who LOVES JLaw. But when you compare Hunger Games to crap like Twilight or Mortal Instruments, it's so above that in terms of quality. It deserves to be a big hit.
I really do hope Catching Fire gets some heat (sorry) for its costumes. They had me alternately laughing out loud (Effie's collars are everything) or making me want to know where I could buy some of Peeta's fancy little sweaters. Really fun work, at any rate.
And mild *spoiler* regarding Finnick's sexuality, if you want it:
He's not gay. Sorry. Definitely one of the most interesting characters in the series, though.
Finnick's not gay. They mention he's in love with the girl Mags volunteers for.
Finnick should have been gay, even though yes, he's not. His character makes ten times more sense if he's gay.
And it could be a legit contender for Best Original Song if they push it-Coldplay did the song over the credits and it's one way to ensure Gwyneth shows up. The Globes should bite, at least.
I don't know how to write an opinion without spoiling, but you'll see when you'll see the next movies that many of the things that you are arguing now will make sense.
Also I think you treat the idea of the revolution with lightness... it's going to happen because of the reality of Panem, things were going to explode either way.
And ultimately, Katniss is not posed like a Disney saviour, and that's why she doesn't do much other than survive... unlike other heroes or heroines wich have a purpose or "are born for something".
The nexts should be more introspective, showing that is not so easy to define a good or a bad side because there's always innocent people dying, and how an image can be used. At least, I see it that way. Pretty much like the world.
Ok, Katniss has two boys interested in her, but she's not flip-flopping between boyfriends. Those boys are the last thing on her mind most of the time. I feel she cares more about her mother and sister than she does about these two boys (notice, she never says "I love you" to either one of them, she only ever says it to her sister). Also, what I love about The Hunger Games is that it does away with this whole "Chosen One" thing that a lot of franchises fall into. If you'll notice, most of what happens to Katniss is a result of a choice she makes. She wasn't even selected to the Hunger Games, she volunteered to save her sister's life. She made a choice and that led her to the Hunger Games. Also, the poisoned berries had nothing to do with love, Katniss was rebelling against the games themselves. Peeta went along because he is in love with Katniss, but it wasn't "I'll eat the berries if I can't have my man", it was a way to flip off this whole institution of the Hunger Games by making them choose between having both survive or neither survive. What's fascinating about this whole franchise, especially in this second film, is that Katniss is playing a game against the people who can change the rules at will, so she has to find a way to beat them at their own game, well aware that they have the ability to change them whenever they want. It makes everything much more thrilling.....
I just do not get all this Hunger Games mania. The whole premise sounds lame.
I didn't like Catching Fire as much as the first movie, mostly because it felt a bit long. But Jennifer Lawrence really brings it, and the series continues to have fantastic design elements and coherent, well-shot action. Neither of the films have fleshed out what life is like in District 12 enough for my liking, and I think it robbed the first part of this one of some of its power.
Once again Elizabeth Banks steals the show as Effie. Stanley Tucci continues to find amazing ways to contort his face into a grotesque burlesque of a TV talk-show/reality host.
I'm counting down the minutes until the internet coughs up a gif of Lawrence's reaction to Johanna's strip in the elevator. That was PRICELESS.
@denny there is one already. ;)
riohter scale -- i understand that the poison berries wasn't about a man... i was being sarcastic. it's still a grand suicidal gesture but it's a selfaware one since Katniss is using all these things rather than simply being a morose victim.
i like jennifer lawrence in these movies so much but i guess everyone does.
denny -- agreed on nearly all counts.
Ajam
lol those poison berries. That was a dumb plot point.
I also disliked CGI dogs (!?!?!), Peeta wasn't great, and hated the weird character protecting film hurting don't-let-her-kill-anyone-nice scripting that you mention. Everyone she kills doesn't have to be by accident & they don't have to be crazy horrible people with no souls. The film could use the angst of having to kill an innocent - it's angst that the whole set-up demands - it shouldn't take 3-4 films to get there - but my guess is it'll happen at the finale of the final film.
Although, overall, I did like the first film and am looking forward to seeing this one - but from your review it sounds like it still has the same problems. bummer.
But Nathaniel, you didn't tell us if you were Team Peeta or Team Gale! :P
I'd personally go with Thor's brother.
Jase -- Team Peeta. adorable pocket boyfriend with an agonizingly good heart who is also crafty. AND CAN BAKE!
I agree these hunger game movies are dumb and disposable.
But JL is a real sweetheart so I'm happy for her success and financial security,
even if it comes via the "pirates of the carabien" disposable avenue.
(Its a movie for kids anyway.)
I'd rather see JL getting paid for nothing than jj abrams making the millions he does for his horrendous, callous and culture molesting tripe.