Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

Oscar Trivia Madness
Oldest Years in Which All Oscar Nominees Are Still Alive


Comment Fun

What did you see this weekend?

"Summer 1993. Just beautiful." - Sarah

"I saw Hereditary and honestly thought it was a masterpiece. Fun that it's so divisive." - Philip H

"The best movie I saw this weekend was on PBS' Man with the Orange Shirt a great romantic gay film" - Jaragon


Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 470 Patron SaintsIf you read us daily, please be one.  Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience


What'cha Looking For?
« Globe Predictions? Let's Go Out on a Few Limbs... | Main | Interview: Oscar-Winner Asghar Farhadi Returns with "The Salesman" »

75th Anniversary: The Wolf Man

by Tim Brayton

This weekend marks the 75th anniversary of one of the most special of all horror classics: it was on December 9, 1941 that Universal Pictures released The Wolf Man. And in so doing, the studio that did so much to invent American horror cinema made one of its most lasting contributions to popular culture.

The Wolf Man was not the first werewolf movie (though it can be easily argued that, at the time it was released, it was the best), but its success did more to pave the way for future werewolves in film and literature than any other individual work of art...

But even that's only a portion of the impact the film had. You know how werewolves transform at the full moon, and can only be killed by silver weapons? You almost certainly wouldn't if those quintessential bits of wisdom hadn't been promoted out of the enormous corpus of werewolf folklore by screenwriter Curt Siodmak in this film and its slightly awful 1943 sequel, Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man. For that matter, even the idea that a werewolf is a human-shaped, vaguely wolfish beast, instead of an actual wolf, was mostly popularized by this film (after appearing in Universal's 1935 Werewolf of London, which made barely a ripple during its first release).

Not at all a shabby legacy for a hastily-made B-picture, which came out after Universal had largely abandoned horror to the matinee audiences. For all the film's stature nowadays as one of the building blocks of classic horror cinema this was nowhere near the level of prestige as the '30s films Dracula and Frankenstein; this was a pure program-filler, with no artistic aspirations at all. It just happens to be the case that, for a grimy B-movie, it's one of the very best of its generation.

The responsibility for that rests on a few different people, with Siodmak certainly near the top of the list. The German immigrant, who got his start in that country's film industry alongside such future luminaries as Billy Wilder and Fred Zinnemann before they all fled in the early '30s, was one of the key figures in the horror and sci-fi genres in the 1940s and 1950s. Even by his elevated standards, The Wolf Man just might the best script he ever wrote in Hollywood. What the film manages, quite niftily, is to marry a relatively contemporary setting and modern characters with the timeless, misty world of European folklore. The Wolf Man is secretly a tragic fairy tale, in which the prodigal son Larry Talbot returns home to Wales, encounters magic, and ends up suffering for no reason other than running afoul of the mysteries of the spooky Old World. The mixture of 20th Century rationalism and medieval legend works spectacularly well, with Talbot a uniquely effective protagonist in '40s horror: the Americanized man of reason cursed to turn into an evil being, and endlessly tormented by his helplessness.

To bring Talbot to life, the film benefitted from one of the best casting choices in Universal's entire horror output. For most of his career, Lon Chaney, Jr. could do just one thing, but it was exactly the thing that he's called upon to do in The Wolf Man: play a thick, big-hearted lug putting over simple decency tarnished by sad-sack self-loathing. Chaney's Talbot is a great Everyman, unexceptionally pleasant in all ways, and watching the dough-faced man fall into despair at his own inability to stop himself from causing destruction is genuinely sad, the most truly successful emotional appeal made in any Universal film after Boris Karloff stopped playing the deeply soulful Frankenstein monster.

In fairness, while most of the film's success hinges on the writing and performance of the lead character, those are hardly the only things about The Wolf Man that work. It's a beautiful film, with journeyman director George Waggner and cinematographer Joseph Valentine (a former Oscar nominee and future Oscar winner) providing a rich amount of gloom to draw all possible ghostly atmosphere from the fog-shrouded stock sets that never looked nearly this good again. It would be far too much to claim that, in the year 2016, any of this is even a littie bit "scary", but it has the richness of a particularly great ghost story, and that gives it more than a little bit of a kick.

The film is an evergreen classic for good reason, and even if 75 years have turned it from a movie into an institution, it's not unearned. The wolf man himself is one of the great iconic figures of the genre, and it's a great pleasure to report that the movie containing him continues to hold up.

more on Horror genre
more from Tim Brayton 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (3)

I love this movie. It's my favorite of the old Universal horror pictures. I agree that the cinematography and Mr Chaney are spectacular. The score is also great. But you can't have a good horror film without the heroine and Evelyn Ankers is just splendid. Her scream is famous and she is the best known Universal scream queen. She was such an underrated actress who unfortunately got typecast and played damsel in distress roles.

December 10, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterTom

Claude Rains is excellent too.

December 10, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterTom

The Wolf Man is a classic, but I'd also like to put in a recommendation for Universal's earlier Werewolf of London (1935). It's more of a piece with the great second wave of their horror films like The Invisible Man and Bride of Frankenstein - more sophisticated than the first wave, but not yet hardened into the slicker cliche-fest of the third wave that began with Son of Frankenstein (1939).

Anyway, while there are plenty of creaky aspects to Werewolf of London, and it owes more to the 1931 Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde than the later werewolf films (e.g., its transforming protagonist is a doctor whose experiment has gone wrong), it was the first appearance of important tropes like when-transformed-you-will-seek-to-kill-your-dearest-love. And while the werewolf makeup is less extreme, the transformation scenes are great. (Twilight Zone fans: this is where the great transforming-while-passing-columns effect used for the devil in "The Howling Man" originates.)

And yeah - aristocrat Dr. Glendon/Henry Hull isn't nearly as sympathetic a protagonist as poor Larry Talbot/Lon Chaney. And Warner Oland as Dr. Yogami is a disturbing example of the bogus-Asian casting of that era...

Still, it's an important stepping stone in werewolf films and deserves to be better known. Not to unseat The Wolf Man as THE werewolf film, but as a worthwhile attempt that every Univesal horror fan should know.

December 10, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterDoctor Strange

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>