Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
COMMENTS

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« It's a very tight race for this year's Annie Awards | Main | Five Sundance Films to Get Excited About »
Thursday
Dec052019

Review: The Aeronauts

by Chris Feil

There’s an eyesore on the horizon with The Aeronauts, a cynically observed aerial adventure fatally encumbered by too many pixels. Reuniting the Felicity Jones and Eddie Redmayne after The Theory of Everything first welcomed both into the Oscar fold, this film is a strange amalgam of influences it fails to live up to. It’s part survival actioner, part vibrant costume drama, and part uplifting women-in-science empowerment tale. But the film’s blending of the three, and its attempts to infuse some modernity to the storytelling, is too clumsy to satisfy any of its points of entry.

The film stars Jones as Amelia Wren, a mid-19th century balloon pilot grieving an unexpected personal cost of her professional on top of patriarchal limitations. Her expertise makes her a fitting partner to Redmayne’s scientist James Glaisher, aiming to prove the science of early meteorology against highly skeptical widespread thought. But Wren and Glaisher have their own clashing of methods and degree of determination. In their flight mission, Glaisher pushes for them to ascend higher than any balloon in history, turning their quest for information into a brief but dangerous fight for survival.

While The Aeronauts certainly makes the case for why their flight should be terrifying, the film itself diffuses its capacity for excitement in most of its narrative decision making. A major misstep comes from the film’s structure, flashing back and forth between their ascent and their backstories leading up to their collaboration and the mission itself. This lack of linear plotting may be a stab at something more original from a very familiar plot, but this strips the mission of the sense of built tension that fatally wounds the film from the jump. With the ensuing sloppy pacing, this foundation makes the film struggle to establish character and stakes beyond just how dangerous it all is - at least that invest us in the chintzy spectacle it relies on so heavily.

More troublesome is how the film is composed with questionable taste, or perhaps a dire lack of self-awareness. Packed with unintentional humor coming from random citizens defined only by their haughtiness in regards to balloons, the film is cartoonish in characterization and its inauthentic visual tapestry. It’s not just that the film’s visual effects don’t convince once they take to the skies, it’s that their unfinished look actively takes us out of the film, zapping any generated suspense. The film is too sickly Technicolor, too polyester - one of the few movies in recent memory that’s resoundingly sank by its garish aesthetics.

Amelia is also a grossly underserved heroine, stuck with more empty platitudes than genuine human feeling. The film makes her tragic circumstance into a kind of late-reveal mystery while the particulars are rather obvious. Director Tom Harper, after delivering a rousing actress showcase earlier this year with Wild Rose, can’t move aside from the film’s overzealous theatrics when it should be focusing on Jones’s performance. Of all the ways the film cuts even its simplest pleasures off at the knees, it’s how it fails Amelia that rankles the most.  

That’s not hot air filling The Aeronauts for 100 lugubrious minutes, it’s just gassy.

Grade: D+

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (14)

Swing and a miss. Hard pass.

December 5, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterBrevity

Good to know Chris thanks!

December 5, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterLadyEdith

I suppose The Aeronauts and myself both have something in common: gassiness 😂

December 5, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterPeggy Sue

Eddie Redmayne... ugh... pass. He's so unbearable these days.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered Commenterthevoid99

I watched it with my 14-year-old son and we both loved it.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterGuest SAG columnist

Women don't belong in balloons.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterRebecca

I don't use emoticons. I'm not twelve.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterPeggy Sue

I kept wondering who the guy was on the poster and then realized thats supposed to be Eddie Redmayne, it doesn't look him.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterBJ

I just can't with these two actors. Please, make them go away.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered Commenterbrookesboy

You also don't have any joy Peggy Sue, so stay consistent. Ruining female handle names. We're not all harpies!

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne (The Real One)

I had zero cocks in 2019.

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered Commentermarkgordonuk

Everyone knows that Peggy Sue is a dude, imbecile

December 6, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterMareko

Whom the fuck says so Mareko? Female handle names is not equal to female person you moron. You couldn’t even source your Karen Black rumor in the other thread you untrustworthy imbecile.

December 8, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne (The Real One)

Maybe it's because Amelia isn't a real person and was made up for the film because they couldn't bear the thought of it being two men like in reality.

December 8, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterRobMiles
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.