Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

COMMENTS

Oscar Takeaways
12 thoughts from the big night

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Take Three: Michael Biehn | Main | Attack of the 26 Foot Woman »
Saturday
Jul162011

Yes, No, Maybe So: Hugo

Robert (author of Distant Relatives) here. If you, like me, have been wondering how the phrases "Martin Scorsese" and "family-friendly holiday season event film" could possibly fit together ever since the announcement of The Invention of Hugo Cabret...

...later shortened to Hugo Cabret, later shortened to Hugo (by the time the film hits theaters in November it may just be H.) the newly released trailer may answer your questions, though not necessarily satisfactorily, and may leave you with all new ones. Let's discuss.

The name Martin Scorsese was, is, and will continue to be the selling point behind this film, at least for cinephiles who consider each new Scorsese film an event. But the trailer here has definitely been cut for the kind of mass audience that doesn't flock to Scorsese in droves. If you're looking for something non-threatening enough for the kids, but well crafted enough for adults, this trailer is targeting you. And in that sense the trailer does have something of an "instant holiday classic" feel to it. Not to mention some possibly impressive production design by Dante Feretti that could get him noticed again after his Shutter Island snub last season.

Yet while the production design appears promising, there's always the possibility that this busy-looking film will be a gold and teal nightmare. The 3D cinematography is rife with things flying at the camera. In this trailer alone we count at least five: Sacha Baron Cohen's hand, a dog, dragon smoke, a key necklace, and Hugo's hand. (So help me if that scene of Hugo going down a big fun slide is accompanied with a POV shot) Barring the title card there's not much here that feels Scorsese. Sure it's off his genre, but even when he does go off genre, Scorsese explores the same general themes and ideas (once calling The Age of Innocence his most violent picture). So even the slightest hint of a Scorsese touch, like the presence of Ray Winstone, was welcome, though I wanted to shout "No Hugo! Don't go with Mr. French!"

So what is Scorsese doing? Pilling up money for his next project? An academic exercise in trying something new?

Actually what he's doing is a family-friendly holiday season event film in exactly the way Scorsese would do it. Scorsese was never going to do fantasy in the mold of something modern. His films always reference back to the classics. Even Shutter Island disappointed many by possessing the obviousness of an old melodramatic Hammer Horror film instead of something that felt new. But that's what he does. Something tells me that what interested Scorsese in this project was the potential to make an homage to Georges Méliès (played by Ben Kingsley) and the films that birthed the fantasy genre. And those films were indeed intentionally artificial and filled with gimmicks.

So maybe we can't fault Scorsese for inconsistency of vision. We may want Scorsese to be modern and inventive. We may want him to wow us with spectacle like Peter Jackson or Christopher Nolan. But that's the fault of our expectation. What Scorsese clearly wants to do is recreate the magic of the old days. Whether or not you end up liking Hugo may depend on whether you appreciate the note on which the trailer ends, a recreation of the Lumiere's brother's L'arrivée d'un train à La Ciotat this time with the train actually pummelling toward the audience... in 3D.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (10)

He should be making adult character pictures with no budget and no Leo.

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered Commenter/3rtfu11

Maybe but probably No because i have the same feeling than in front of BENJAMIN BUTTON(well-executed but Fincher wasn't the adequate director for the movie) and it seems a kid movie (maybe a very good movie but a kid-oriented movie) AND i f*** 3D

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered Commentercaro

I say that since Scorsese personally shelled out the money for the movie rights to the book back in 2007, he probably has damn good reason to make this movie beyond being a cash grab or an academic exercise.

The obvious reason is that Scorcese felt a connection to the material. He has never made a movie that didn't resonate with him in some way, and the key connection here seems to be Georges Méliès, the father of cinema and a pioneer of various technical innovations that have since become commonplace. A theme of the book involves the birth of film as an artistic medium, and in the hands of Scorsese, perhaps the most passionate of all film directors in terms of the art form and preservation thereof, could become a terrific achievement.

I think the reason so many are doubting this project is because, despite all of theirsquawking to the contrary, people HATE to see their favorite directors take chances and expand their horizons. They want their directors to stay in their little boxes: Scorsese, you make your gangster movies. Spielberg, you make your sci-fi movies. Nolan, your action thrillers. Anything else is a mistake because it prevents someone from having preconceived notions and background to judge it on before it's released. Also, it's in 3D, which is a popular punching bag (one that Scorsese has said in the past that he's a big fan of, no less).

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKevin Klawitter

Strong Yes.

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterArkaan

I was really curious about this movie until seeing the trailer but it looks like one hot mess to me. Just precious, gimmicky, oversold, overacted, overdesigned.

UGH. I *HATE* this trailer. honestly I do. My desire to see plumetted.

July 16, 2011 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

No budget character studies?? Why!? I say, bring on the new. Did anyone expect Scorsese to do a good comedy the first time? (The King of Comedy.) That first time is one of his masterworks. I think this trailer just showcases the most "commercial" aspects of the movie in one convenient package. Please, let's just hold off judgment. It looks well crafted at least. We'll get a fuller sense of the overall execution when it's released.

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

I am a huge fan of Scorsese and especially of George Melies so I'm giving all the 'LET'S GO ON AN ADVENTURE' the benefit of the doubt.

July 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRJ

Saw this trailer before the last HP film and couldn't agree more, Nathaniel. It looks so lightweight... almost corny. What's with all the disappointing trailers this year?

July 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

Yep, I'm with Nathaniel.
I was very interested too before the trailer but...

July 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJames T

Hi that is very nice blog and describe many facility in the blog kids furniture very good,log beds and other log furniture i like all furniture.

July 18, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterlog furniture
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.