Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Oscar History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
What'cha Looking For?
Don't Miss This!
Comment Fun

Comment Du Jour
First Time Oscar Nominees - who will be back first?

"Probably the last nomination for all of them." - Fred

"From this group, I'd say Ruth Negga, Lucas Hedges, and Dev Patel are likely to return again." - Aaron

"Out of all the nominees I think it's a little strange that Garfield was the least deserving but most likely to be nominated again. " - Tom

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500 Patron Saints!

IF YOU READ THE SITE DAILY, PLEASE BE ONE BY DONATING. 
Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

INTERVIEWS

Oscar Nominee Interviews
Asghar Farhadi (The Salesman)
Martin Butler & Bentley Dean (Tanna)
Nicole Kidman (Lion)
Denis Villeneuve (Arrival
Krystof Deak (Sing)
Robert Legato (The Jungle Book)
Rich Moore (Zootopia) 

 

Subscribe
« Top Ten: Strange Golden Globe Musical Snubs | Main | Curio: Jodie at 25 »
Tuesday
Nov132012

#PunditProblems

And here I thought excitement was suspicously low for The Hobbit...

Not three hours after Warner Bros listed screenings for guild members (that includes BFCA members like myself plus all the inside showbiz organizations like AMPAS, HFPA and BAFTA etcetera) every single last screening of The Hobbit was filled to capacity (except the ones in San Francisco). I even attempted a 48 FPS* screening as a last resort though I have absolutely no desire for yet another new gimmick to soil the world's greatest artform -- isn't 3D cheapening things enough?

*I decided to give this its own tag below but I pray that I will never be forced to use it again!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

Not interested at all. I saw the trailer the other day watching Skyfall and I swear I thought it was one of those spoof movies with the Wayan brothers.

November 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPeggy Sue

Why would you think excitement was low? When advance tickets went on sale a few weeks ago, they were outselling Skyfall and the latest Twilight drivel.

November 15, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterchris

In my naivete, I must ask - what is 48 fps...?

November 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterLaika

I'll take the one in SF. ;)

November 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterBeau

Ya know, I am still mad as hell about them turning it into three movies, but every time I see a trailer for it in the theater, I get downright giddy in anticipation. It's my favorite book of all time, and Jackson has a proven handle on the world and the material in general (if not this material specifically). And Ian McKellen. And Cate Blanchett. And Hugo Weaving.

I am not so sure about the whole 48 frames per second thing, though. I was over at a friend's the other day and he had his massive, super-HD TV on, and it so happened Titanic was showing. It looked weird, not like a film at all. I'm not sure I liked it. And it seems from the preview footage that 48fps looks comparable to that.

HOWEVER, I am SO DOWN for the massive LOTR Extended Edition marathon in theaters, if I can find one near me.

November 15, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterdenny

Ehh, these screenings have been up for the past month. I've reserved for 3 different showings, taking 3 different friends. #sorryimnotsorry