Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
COMMENTS

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Take Three: Brad Dourif | Main | Curio: Viewing The Master »
Tuesday
Sep112012

TIFF: "The Sessions"

Amir reporting from the Toronto International Film Festival

It's hard to think that a film about a man living in an iron lung could be labelled “the feel good movie of the festival.” But The Sessions beats the odds. For director Ben Lewin, who himself struggled with polio as a child, and his stellar cast, sex, disability, Catholicism and humour blend together to shape the unlikeliest of crowd pleasers.

The Sessions centres of Mark O’Brien (John Hawkes), a poet who fell victim to polio in his childhood and lost all his muscle strength from the neck down. His body retains its sensitivity, hence the narratively critical ability to achieve erections, but is unable to move and requires an iron lung to breathe. At the age of 38 and faced with the prospect that his days might be numbered before he ever gets to “meet” a woman, O’Brien decides to lose his virginity; and to do that, he’ll have to overcome two obstacles: an overwhelming sense of anxiety caused by his physical disability, and a fear of being sinful resulted from his devout belief in the Catholic church.

The second obstacle is easier for him to clear as he consults Father Brendan (a hilarious and poignant William H. Macy), an unconventionally forgiving priest who tells O’Brien that in his heart he knows Jesus will give him a pass. With that green light, O’Brien goes on to find Cheryl Cohen Greene (a top-form Helen Hunt), a sex therapist who is willing to take him through the mechanics of sex in six sessions.

The Sessions isn’t exactly a biopic... Luckily, there is no greatest hits list of events from O’Brien’s life and this allows for a focused and thoughtful narrative to take shape. As simple as its story is – and very conventionally told, too – the fact that the film puts the spotlight so brightly on the sex life of a disabled man and discusses it with frankness and explicit sexuality, makes it special. God forbid people in their forties ever be so open about their sex lives in Hollywood films, even able bodied ones; this is a very welcome surprise.

On top of that, part of why the film succeeds is its ability to make us laugh out loud at certain situations that do not merit laughter otherwise. O'Brien's outstanding sense of humour that got him through each day is present in the dialogue. Lewin, too, in the most well-intentioned manner, makes light of a tragic situation. And yet, humour isn't the strongest weapon in The Sessions' arsenal. That would be John Hawkes, whose performance is worthy of all the praise that has been lavished on him. He relies on nothing except his facial muscles for expressivity but is absolutely staggering in bringing the character to life, pulling off his sweet humour, his nasal voice and his palpable anxiety.

Hawkes has been on a roll in the past couple of years with his Oscar nominated performance in Winter's Bone and an equally powerful turn in Martha Marcy May Marlene. Immediately after The Sessions screened at Sundance, he was touted as a potential Oscar nominee. That seems inevitable as there's virtually nothing standing in his way - a likeable actor in a likeable film playing an extremely likeable person with with a disability, with a really strong, emotional performance to boot. The bigger question is whether he can go all the way to win and whether the film, given the Academy's tendency to award this type of adult-oriented crowd-pleaser, has the potential to expand beyond the best actor category.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

I am now wondering why Nathaniel has not included William H. Macy in his list of potential Best Supporting Actor candidates! I seem to recall he was in the list maybe for April Fool Day's predictions...

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMarcos

Marcos - he's very good in the film, but there's one problem. It's a very, very short role. If he's competing with co-leads, he'll fall short.

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterAmir

so, is Hunt's character lead or supporting? there's been a lot of debate about her placement for awards season

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered Commentereduardo

She is being campaigned as supporting I believe and I think that's right.

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterAmir

Lest we forget I saw this last month at the Melbourne film festival :)

Also: Macy just doesn't have much to do. He's perfectly fine and likeable, but it's really not much of a role.

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterGlenn

Yes, the studio hasn't waivered that she's going supporting.

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterNathaniel R

Amir and Glenn: Thanks for letting me know that Macy's role in "The Sessions" is very short. Pity! I love the guy! Maybe next year he'll direct himself into a nomination (and wife Felicity Huffman, too) with the attractive premise of "Rudderless." Or perhaps "A Single Shot" with recent nominees Melissa Leo and Sam Rockwell.

September 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMarcos
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.