NOW PLAYING

out in theaters

just out on DVD/BluRay

review index

HOT TOPICS



CLASSIC OF THE MOMENT

 

Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R


 Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. Also loves cats. All material herein is written and copyrighted by him, unless otherwise noted. twitter | facebook | pinterest | tumblr | letterboxd

 

Powered by Squarespace
Comment Fun

COMMENT DU JOUR
Emmy Aftermath - how to fix the Emmys?

"Personally, I'm opposed to capping wins or even nominations, even if seeing Modern Family win year after year drives me up the walls. I think it look punishing to the winners, instead of addressing the real issue, which are the voters and the voting system, and how even as things change and get more diverse and they try to catch up, they still don't vote that outside that box at all. It still takes that little aura of prestige for different shows to break in, and there is such a gap between what's great and what's awards-material." - Tee

Nathaniel's Fixes - agree or disagree?

Keep TFE Strong

Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

For those who can't commit to a dime a day, consider a one time donation for an article or a series you are glad you didn't have to live without.

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Box Office: Hotel Transylvania vs. Looper | Main | Married Ladies »
Sunday
Sep302012

Review: "Looper"

An abridged version of this review was originally posted in my column at Towleroad 

"Time travel hasn't been invented yet," Joseph Gordon-Levitt warns us from 2042 in LOOPER's voiceover. "But in the future it will be." In 2072 crime lords send their victims back in time to be killed by "loopers"  like Joe since it's the only way to get away with murder. (Apparently infallible forensic science has also been invented in the future!). 

Loopers dispatch their prey unceremoniously with a crude descendant of the shotgun called a  "Blunderbuss" which is useless at long distances but impossible to miss with up close. When each Looper's contract expires, his older self is sent back to his younger self for execution which is called "Closing the Loop". In this case that's Bruce Willis sent back in time to meet his death at the hands of Joseph Gordon-Levitt in Bruce Willis drag. (Joe's makeup effects, though extraordinarily non fake-looking are initially distracting -- JGL doesn't look like that!

Nothing kills genre films quicker than exposition. When you have to pass out glossaries to the uninitiated or explain the rules over and over again, a story can sputter and die or, at the very least, bore you stupid the second time throughLooper, however, is a wonderfully nimble exception given the size of the learning curve. More...

Every little factoid here, whether casually tossed off, painstakingly explained in narration, or visually suggested pays off organically. The movie is free to spend its time on things that are a lot more interesting like its characters, how past and future relate to one another and audience-baiting "would you?" moral questions about whether the end will justify the means.

The Loopers are paid in silver which is a clever Biblical way of signalling the movie's loftier thematic ambitions and moral slipperiness. Joe, who we immediately think of as the hero solely on the virtue of being the protagonist, pulls a Judas early on and this hero thing is really called into question. (His cold blooded killings should have alerted us straightaway but American movies have so much gunplay you get numb to the gunlove.) Once Joe fails to close his own loop -- no one Dies Harder in the movies than Bruce Willis -- the chase begins and the movie takes off and in surprising directions, too.

[No spoilers here -- the trailer had the good rare sense to save some of its best moments.]

Young Joe vs. Old Joe, which provides the middle of the movie with much of its action, power and humor keeps asking you to shift allegiances and somehow manages to flatter both older and younger audiences without pandering to either; old Joe is wiser but maybe Young Joe is more flexible in his thinking. Soon the plot pieces and moral quandaries grow as high and maze-like as the cornfields young Joe hides in outside the farm of Sara (Emily Blunt) and her boy Cid (Pierce Gagnon).It helps to have three completely engaging stars to sell material this convoluted. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, so unusually slim and mischievous-looking for typical action-hero duties, doesn't lose his star appeal under the makeup; Emily Blunt turns it out both maternally and sensually as the suffering mom / love interest; and finally there's Bruce Willis. He is, as ever, one of the very best movie stars with an underappreciate ability to shift his Bruceness just so to meet the very specific demands of multiple genres and unique filmmakers.

What a surprise Looper turns out to be, both in its scripted novelistic layers,  it's overall accessibility but also for its visual panache. The minimalist aesthetic proves an extremely smart choice given the complicated story the movie has to deliver. The few big f/x moments really pop given their restraint. The smart camera work also let's one key repetitive moment -- we see the "close the loop" sequence more than once -- the camera wisely backs away where lesser filmmakers would've relied on tight closeups, allowing the once tense moment to shift to something almost comically blunt and tiny.

Writer/Director Rian Johnson first made a name for himself with Brick, a teen noir that won a small hardcore group of fans but was so in love with its own hipster reflection that it forgot to ever look to the audience that might be watching it and looking for a way inside. Looper's world is, in its own, way is just as sealed off with strange new behavioral codes and verbiage. But this time Rian Johnson is as sure-handed and quick as Joe the looper. He's armed with a blunderbuss and blowing massive holes in each potential obstacle to your entertainment, inviting audiences to come racing in. Which they might once word-of-mouth kicks in. 

Grade: B+
Oscar Chances: If it's a sleeper hit -- too soon to know -- you could see some movement in the editing, sound, and makeup categories. The visual effects are compelling but certainly way too low key for this branch which prefers massive visual f/x setpieces.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: Mikey
    This topic has always been one of my favorite subjects to read about. I have found your post to be very rousing and full of good information. I will check your other articles shortly.

Reader Comments (9)

I hope it lands a Best Original Screenplay nomination. But in my heart of hearts, I don't think the Academy has room for both this and Seven Psychopaths...

September 30, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterDevin D

Not my fave. Tonally, I found it all over the place. Cid in particular was inappropriately funny (to me). But I realize I'm in a tiny minority who feel this way.

October 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

You're not alone, Evan. Although I appreciated the inventiveness, I too felt whiplashed by the proceedings and irked by ludicrousness. (For "assassins," those hunting down young and old Joe are the worst shooters known to man.)

October 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMareko

Mareko -- I thought that was a funny bit if underexplored comedically... they make a point of saying that the blunderbuss is a can't miss weapon at close range so why would these men ever become good shots ;)

October 1, 2012 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Speaking of, the name "blunderbuss" was part of the problem for me. The premise-- time travel used by criminals-- is kinda plausible (assuming time travel could exist). But then the future world gets populated with these kitchy details-- the "blunderbuss," flying motorcycles (but not cars, oddly enough), drugs you put in your eye, etc. It felt like a thought experiment of what some action film lovers thought would make for an "awesome" future.

October 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

I vacillated between seeing "Looper" and "The Master" this past Saturday, and the latter won out. Now I wish I had chosen differently.

October 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterTroy H.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt is pretty much Bruce Willis’s Son! I can’t believe they aren’t related. I thought they sounded oddly familiar, until I found out Joseph ripped the audio from Bruce’s movies to study his voice, it all makes sense now. And I may like his performance from Looper better than his in Batman’s! I learned all this in this great interview on the movie by Melissa DiMarco.

http://youtu.be/61Cdn66R-4Y

November 9, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPat Dixcar

OMG! Emily Blunt is such an amazing actress I can’t believe she based her accent off of a male’s voice, that’s talent! Love the dress she is wearing in this interview! It’s so elegant, and goes great with her hair style. http://youtu.be/61Cdn66R-4Y

–Madison Riley

November 9, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMadison Riley

I’m IN LOVE with Joseph Gordon-Levitt I would loop through time to be with him, check out this amazing interview with him <3 http://youtu.be/61Cdn66R-4Y

November 9, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterHarlowe Nixon
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.