NOW PLAYING

out in theaters

just out on DVD/BluRay

review index

HOT TOPICS



CLASSIC OF THE MOMENT

 

Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R


 Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. Also loves cats. All material herein is written and copyrighted by him, unless otherwise noted. twitter | facebook | pinterest | tumblr | letterboxd

 

Powered by Squarespace
Comment Fun

COMMENT DU JOUR
EMMY NIGHT APPROACHES
Who are you rooting for?
Who would you bunk with at Litchfield
Who would you sex up in Masters of Sex? 

Keep TFE Strong

Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

For those who can't commit to a dime a day, consider a one time donation for an article or a series you are glad you didn't have to live without.

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Linknesses | Main | Cinema de Gym: 'Megamind' »
Saturday
Sep242011

NYFF: "Melancholia" This Is The Way The World Ends 

[Editor's Note: Our NYFF coverage begins! You'll be hearing from Michael and Kurt and me. -Nathaniel]

Hey, everybody. Serious Film’s Michael C. here reporting from the New York Film Festival. I’m jumping right into the deep end of the pool with the first title so let’s get to it.

When the world ends in Lars von Trier’s Melancholia it is definitely going to be with a bang and not a whimper. The film opens with a stunning series of images centered around a rogue planet spinning out from behind the sun on a course to smash into Earth like a wrecking ball. It’s a dark nihilistic death dance, the B-side to Tree of Life’s sun-dappled song of life. The sequence alone is worth the price of admission.

From there the film splits neatly into halves. The first concerns the wedding of clinically depressed bride Kirsten Dunst to “aw shucks” wholesome groom Alexander Skarsgård. The second concerns Dunst and sister Charlotte Gainsbourg grappling with the whole possible destruction of the planet thing. Both halves follow similar arcs with characters hoping against hope that the worst case scenario can be avoided before remembering that this is, after all, a von Trier movie.

I’m not sure splitting up the stories was the wisest choice, since the second half never recovers the energy of the wedding scenes. I could write that the second half creaks under the weight of its symbolism, but if Von Trier is willing to fill the sky with an ominous death planet named after his own depression, who am I to point out that the whole thing is a bit "on the nose"?

Melancholia would have to qualify as a minor disappointment considering the shattering impact Von Trier is capable of, but still, it's an experience worth having. The whole cast is aces. Dunst rises to the occasion with a bone deep convincing portrayal of smothering depression, while Kiefer Sutherland, to my surprise, punches through in a big way as Gainsbourg’s wealthy put-upon husband. Best of all, is the wall to wall breathtaking cinematography by Manuel Alberto Claro, which, by the way, is probably the film's best shot at awards attention. The whole thing has a cumulative effect greater than the sum of its flaws.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

If only Magnolia weren't distributing Melancholia, Dunst would maybe have a shot at a nomination. She has all the right factors backing her.

September 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSteven

Can't wait to see it.

September 24, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterferdi

Not sure if I'll get more hate for this or more support, but for me, nothing after Antichrist can be a disappointment, minor or major. So I'm still looking forward to this one.
Reading the reports from Cannes, I always feared the symbolism would be too much though. I should wait and see I guess.

September 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterAmir

Steven -- i think Dunst's problem for a nomination (even if it had a huge distributor) is that she has to share the movie... because Gainsbourg takes over in the second half.

Amir -- i was not crazy about Antichrist and this was MUCH stronger. I'm not sure how much i liked it but i definitely liked it. Must finish my review which i have only haphazardly started.

September 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNathaniel R

Kirsten is my favorite actress...so I'm still wishing for her to get awards traction, haha. I can't give up hope. :(

September 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPhilip

Also ... i love this review.

Both halves follow similar arcs with characters hoping against hope that the worst case scenario can be avoided before remembering that this is, after all, a von Trier movie.
HA!

the opening sequence is beyond stunning. It's such a strange construction though as a film, given the size of its first moments.

September 25, 2011 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

On the nose, superficial, that's it. His apocalypse in microcosmos that was Dogville was way more intelligent, compelling, deep. I think LVT is still a very gifted director, but he can' write anymore. His screenplays now are so, I don't know, shallow? I think we deserve more than "Earth is evil" and "Chaos reigns", don't we?

September 25, 2011 | Unregistered Commentercal roth

I agree about all that was said here. I appreciated the film. But didn't LOVE it.
Dunst and Gainsbourg are both leads. And Sutherland does make quite a surprising impression. The cinematography and opening sequence in particular are stunning.

September 26, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJoseph

Don't you mean "CHAOS.........REIGNS"?

September 30, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.