Oscar History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

Happy Thanksgiving
tis the season for gratitude - read our thank you lists and share your own

Comment Fun

Comment(s) Du Jour
Spirit Nominations
Call Me By Your Name leads with 6

"I think Good Time is going to do better this award season then people realize. It's slowly developing a cult following similar to Drive. " - Mike

"Really happy to see Harris Dickinson in male lead. That's a great category." - Joseph

Ugh Armie Hammer in Call Me By Your Name reeks of Rooney Mara in Carol all over again. LGBTQ film with two obvious co-leads where one is relegated to supporting and pushes out a fantastic, legit supporting player (Sarah Paulson/Michael Stuhlbarg)." - Aaron

What'cha Looking For?
Interviews

new Nikolaj Lie Kaas Actor
(Denmark's Oscar Submission)
Hana Jusic Director
(Croatia's Oscar Submission)
Alain Gomis Director
(Senegal Oscar Submission)

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500 Patron Saints!

IF YOU READ THE SITE DAILY, PLEASE BE ONE BY DONATING. 
Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Subscribe
« Team Top Ten: Oscar's Greatest Losers (Actor Edition) | Main | NYFCC Runners Up? »
Wednesday
Dec042013

Team FYC: The Conjuring for Best Production Design

In this FYC series series, our contributors are highlighting their favorite fringe contenders this awards season. Here's Dancin' Dan on The Conjuring...

Let's face it: The Academy doesn't, as a rule, like horror films. Even when they're done well. But James Wan's The Conjuring is one we hope they'll honor, especially in the below-the-line categories. The technical elements are all exceptionally well-done, but the production design in particular is damn near flawless. For starters, take a look at that Annabelle doll. Creepy, right? But also totally believable as a toy that a girl might have loved as a child in the 40s or 50s and kept with her as a young adult in the 60s.

The whole film is stuffed with smart design like that. Production Designer Julie Berghoff, Art Director Geoffrey S. Grimsman, and Set Decorator Sophie Neufdorfer built the Perron house used in the film from the ground up and filled it with period-appropriate appliances, photos, and toys that felt used and loved - and, perhaps most importantly, that don't look "scary".

The smartest thing The Conjuring does is to not look like a modern horror movie - all dark and tinted blue or gray, with every set and prop looking like it's on the verge of decay. The Perron house looks old because, simply, it's an old house, and the Perrons bought it knowing it was a bit of a fixer-upper. The items in the basement look old and rotting because they've been blocked off for decades. The family's personal items look new, or at least new-ish, as would fit a middle-class family in 1971. The attention to period detail is all over the movie, and it gives the movie a homespun quality that always works in its favor.

There are a lot of reasons why The Conjuring works as well as it does: strong, surprisingly nuanced performances from Vera Farmiga, Patrick Wilson, and Lili Taylor; the genuinely unsettling score; the almost old-fashioned cinematography - but for me the MVP is all the little details around the edges of the frame, constantly lending a sense of reality to the film. The art direction of The Conjuring is effectively scary when it needs to be (the spiral mirror reflecting on Vera Farmiga's face, that monstrous wardrobe, the Warrens' room of occult objects), but mostly it serves to remind you that these were real people this happened to - a family that could have had a normal life if things had just worked out a little differently. And that's where the true horror lies.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

the doll in the movie looks like Chucky whereas the real doll was a cute rag doll but i agree with you except this point

December 4, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterfrench girl

I have a lot of problems with The Conjuring as a film, but I loved the production design. That cabinet in the bedroom is so perfectly off. You wouldn't notice it in another film but it draws the perfect amount of focus with the odd placement of the ornamentation to signal bad things in a horror film. A lot of The Conjuring works like that. Everything is just a little off.

french girl is right about Annabelle, though. Annabelle, in real life, is so scary because she looks like a perfectly harmless rag doll. The film version might even be one of the dolls from James Wan's Silence about evil dolls/puppets.

December 4, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRobert G

Your points about the actual Annabelle doll are well-taken, but one of the reasons I like the choice to make the doll different is that the rag doll wouldn't have felt of a piece with the look and feel of the film the way that porcelain doll does. It may be one of the (admirably few) obvious choices the film makes design-wise, but I think it's a smart one.

December 4, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterdenny

Thank you for all the support! It was a super fun film to make and I had the support of my director James Wan and all the producers. It takes a collaborative group to make such a great project. I hope to be a part of the next one!

January 5, 2014 | Unregistered Commenterjulie berghoff

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>