Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
COMMENTS

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« NYFF: Home Invasion in 'Exhibition' | Main | StinkyLulu's Preliminary Thoughts on The Supporting Actresses of 1980 »
Friday
Sep272013

Percussion. Strings. Winds. Links

For Musical Nerds
BuzzFeed definite proof that The Little Mermaid's Prince Eric was a homo 
The Exploding Kinetoscope best words I've ever read about Judy Garland's For Me and My Gal
Pajiba more of those new photos from Into the Woods

Miscellania
Sillof's Workshop look at these AMAZING custom toys, If Dr Seuss wrote Jurassic Park
Grantland Mark Harris joins me in my eternally losing war against Category Fraud (this time with Daniel Brühl in Rush) and talks Enough Said, too 

The Film Doctor five notes on Sofia Coppola's The Bling Ring, now on DVD
L Magazine see, I'm not the only one that thinks Cuarón's Gravity is a disappointment!
/Film wait they're making Fargo into a TV series and it's the William H Macy role that's the lead? Don't they know that people loved that movie because of Chief Marge Gunderson?

Elephantitis
Finally, MNPP reminded us that we can all get our Alexander Skarsgard loincloth dreams back on since his Tarzan flick is no longer (apparently) in development hell. Word is that Christoph Waltz is the villain now. Many will greet this as very good news but this makes me sad. It's not that Waltz isn't a good actor but remember how lame it was the last time he was a threat to pachyderms?

Who wants to go back to there? I do not. And I even kinda liked that movie more than most but Waltz was not the why. How about a few more surprises in casting, Hollywood? Aren't there literally a hundred famous actors in Waltz's age range that might be a fun curveball as the villain? But instead we're going to get somebody who already abused elephants. (sigh)

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (10)

Waltz is like Kevin Spacey: he is terrific or terrible, no gray areas. And except for his two Oscar-winning roles and Carnage, he's been very very terrible.

September 27, 2013 | Unregistered Commentercal roth

That link for Prince Eric is so LOL, I was like "WHAT THE...". Bad news for Gil McKinney since they just cast him as Prince Eric in season 3 of Once Upon a Time.

September 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterPJ

I kind of loved Water for Elephants.

September 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterBia

Those pics from Into the Woods are not encouraging. I like the Streep pic best of all, but the rest look like rejects from a tour production of Beauty and the Beast. They don't even fit particularly well. Especially the men.

September 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterHenry

I really liked Water for Elephants. Reese and Pattinson were terrible and their chemistry was non-existent, but the story felt so romantic and epic nonetheless. And the cinematography was beautiful. And I disagree about Christoph. Also, love the title for the post!

September 28, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJoe

That Die Hard list's idea was lifted (along with the ENTIRE intro) from Vulture. Very irresponsible of the author to claim a "written by" without any acknowledgment of the previous list.

http://www.vulture.com/2013/07/25-best-action-movies-since-die-hard.html

September 28, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterkin

I don't know. Christophe Waltz, as a villain? He's never ever done that before.[/sarcasm]

re: Into the Wild

The photos range from "I get what they're going for, but it seems like Marshall's schtick again" (Cinderella's stepsisters) to "those look like mediocre Halloween costumes (Rapunzel, Cinderella).

How do Sondheim musicals get such miscast directors I'll never know.

September 28, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterArkaan

kin -- removed. sorry i try to link up to only original pieces.

September 28, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterNATHANIEL R

No worries Nathaniel. I commented cause I was sure that you didn't know about/remember the original piece.

September 28, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterkin

Pretty sure Waltz could have said no. He's said no before, to David Cronenberg, who had him as Freud in A Dangerous Method. And in that he wouldn't have been playing a villain. Waltz, it seems, is partly the cause of his career.

Though we did get a wonderful Viggo as Freud, so I'm not complaining.

September 30, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterPausner
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.