HOT TOPICS


NOW PLAYING

in theaters



new on dvd


review index

 

Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R


 Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. Also loves cats. All material herein is written and copyrighted by him, unless otherwise noted. twitter | facebook | pinterest | tumblr | letterboxd

 

Powered by Squarespace
Beauty vs. Beast

 

ALMA or HUD ? For you cynical hotties
 Beauty vs Beast 

Comment Fun

COMMENT DU JOUR
Supporting Actress: My Ballot & Yours

"Carrie Coon who in her screen debut steals Gone Girl from the much bigger names. Also can we just talk about how between Nora Durst and Margo Dunne that no one has as impressive a breakout in 2014 then Coon. " - Eion Daly

"Agata Kulesza blew my MIND in "Ida," so she easily gets my top ballot." - Lawson

"Keira Knightley. She just seemed like that rare person who can make you want to be better. So endearing, charming and she also has moments where she shows that she knows more about the world. A silent revolutionary." - MCV

YOURS? And what'cha think of mine?

Keep TFE Strong

Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

For those who can't commit to a dime a day, consider a one time donation for an article or a series you are glad you didn't have to live without.

Subscribe
What'cha Looking For?
« A Year with Kate: Song Of Love (1947) | Main | An Awards Aftermath Question For All »
Wednesday
Jun112014

Brad Pitt in "Fury"

A behind the scenes look at David Ayer's Fury, which takes place late in World War II and collects a bunch of strong actors (Michael Pena, Logan Lerman, Jon Bernthal, etcetera with Brad Pitt to lead them) for tank duty. Did I underestimate it on my Oscar charts? They're shooting on real film. Good on them. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

You conveniently ignore Shia!

June 11, 2014 | Unregistered Commenter3rtful

Um...the main character is called Wardaddy, so the aesthetic choices here, frankly, look BAD. It should be brighter, poppier and more cartoony than even Inglourious, building it's aesthetic style around the out there name of it's central character. Based on that NAME, it was never really going to be an Oscar prospect, but these aesthetic choices indicate, to my eyes, flat-out bad filmmaking.

June 11, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

I don't get why Brad Pitt would do *another* WWII-set ensemble film at this point in his career. Surely there are more interesting scripts and challenging projects he could tackle (unless, of course, this is all a Kate Winslet/The Reader-style maneuver to slam-dunk score that elusive Oscar). Hmm...

June 11, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterMareko

Michael Pena is SO underrated.

June 11, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterAnonny

I think it is a spoiler for supporting actor, maybe screenplay, if anything.

Also, why would it need to be brighter and poppier? It's going for realism, not a cartoon. Weird criticisms. Brad already has his Oscar, unless he is going for an acting one this time around.

June 12, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterRyan

Ryan: WARDADDY. If they're going for grim and gritty realism, CHANGE THAT NAME.

June 12, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

It's honestly not a big deal haha. If you are going to let that dictate how you feel about an entire film, you might want to take a step back and think about that.

June 12, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterRyan

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>