Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
COMMENTS
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Middleburg Day 1: "Lion" is a winner | Main | "Guardians - Vol. 2" is Coming - Obviously »
Friday
Oct212016

Review: "Rocky Horror" Loses Its Edge

by Eric Blume

Last night, Fox TV gave us a remake/update of the cult classic Rocky Horror Picture Show, a staple of midnight movie screenings for decades.  This update, with the tag "Let’s Do The Time Warp Again," aired at the family hour of 8pm, which pretty much sums up everything that’s wrong with it.   

The original 1975 film is the definition of “lightning in a bottle.” There had been nothing quite like it at the time. It was genuinely transgressive, and featured one of the all-time out-there performances by Tim Curry as Frank-n-Furter, everyone’s favorite "sweet transvestite".  While it’s easy to romanticize the original and ignore its weaknesses, the film does deliver as a warm-heated parody of sci-fi and horror movies as intended. What's more it's actually kinky, sexy, unsettling, and fun...

 One of the central jokes of the original film, skillfully executed, is the sexualization of the two main squares, Brad and Janet, played memorably by Barry Bostwick and Susan Sarandon.  How disappointing that the remake, forty years later, is oddly sexless and joyless.

"Let’s Do The Time Warp Again" starts promisingly enough, but the first musical number, “Damnit, Janet,” proves to be the highlight of the night.  While its Greek chorus isn’t sensibly established, the first number is the best-staged and best-shot of them all.  It’s also one of the few numbers where the singing seems to actually be coming from the actor.  Many subsequent numbers are shot so poorly that you can’t connect a human being with the song or the music -- it’s just actors running around a stage to a pre-recorded track coming from nowhere. 

But in “Damnit, Janet,” Ryan McCartan, who plays Brad, launches what is far and away the most smartly-imagined and sustained performance of the production.  McCartan plays in a heightened style pitched to the absurdity of the piece, but with his eye on an arc that goes from nerdy to confused to titillated to ecstatic, and he comes the closest to unearthing some of the edge of the original picture.

Any actor following in the footsteps of Tim Curry’s truly iconic performance has an unenviable task.  Curry’s acting is perhaps even more a miracle of impropriety now than it was upon initial release.  In the role of Frank-n-Furter, Curry had an unnerving quality that makes most viewers, regardless of their predilections, feel aroused, confused, and disquieted by their own sexuality.  His was a true blur of gender and sexuality, and genuinely scary to boot.  With Curry, you’re never sure what you’re watching, but you know that it's both dangerous and playful, and intoxicating mix.  

Our new Frank-n-Furter, Laverne Cox, gets to show her instincts for comedy and her flair for melodrama.  In the film’s final stretch, when she no longer has to play traditional scenes and the piece becomes an onstage extravaganza, she amps up the glamour and her showmanship works well.  But ultimately it’s an artificial performance where Cox aims purely for effects and “acts at” danger and edge, rather than truly finding it.  The director, Kenny Ortega, doesn’t support her performance with any larger conception underneath it.

But that’s the m.o. of Ortega in general.  It’s difficult to follow what some of the actors are playing, but perhaps that’s because they don’t know either.  The biggest victim is Staz Nair, who as Rocky, can’t manage to make any semblance of a character -- even the obvious joke of Rocky being colossally stupid doesn’t play; there’s little more depressing than an unsexy Rocky, who was created for sex.  Ortega hasn’t reconceptualized the piece to play for 2016.  The casting of Cox, a trans actress playing a transvestite, should surely lend something interesting to the material, but without inspiration it's reduced to a stunt.  

The raw material of Rocky Horror Picture Show remains deeply flawed, but it can be forgiven if it’s done in a way that feels transgressive and fun. But even the “Time Warp” song itself, the definition of a fail-safe number, lands with an unexciting thud.  Perhaps there are fewer boundaries to push now, but this version could safely be watched with children and that alone betrays the source material in irrecoverable ways.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

" it’s just actors running around a stage to a pre-recorded track coming from nowhere."
Yup, Pretty much sums it all up. Never have I heard the soundtrack so disconnected from the images on a musical before.

And the look of it was just all wrong, it looks like a cosplay of the Glee version meets disney channel. So uninspired. And kinda cheap too, but not in a b movie good resourceful way. It looks like they didn't have the right budget to make a big production and where trying pass as one.

Why?

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterV.

It was pretty awful. Ryan McCartan was terrific and so was Annaleigh Ashford, but overall the production lacked any liberating sense of depravity. It seems so neutered. Laverne Cox wasn't terrible, but she lacked Tim Curry's magnetism. It was great to see Tim Curry though as the narrator.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterRaul

I thought maybe my TV was being wonky with the sound and actors not matching up, but it wasn't. It really was just poorly staged. I wasn't expecting this to be great to begin with, so I can't say I'm disappointed, I was just hoping to be wrong.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterBrittani

YES. Outside of the couldn't-be-more-perfectly-cast Ashford, Carney, Lambert, and McCartan, this lacked everything that made the original feel so transgressive. With Cox as Frank, it could have been something really special, but it was completely devoid of sex, danger, and anything interesting to say. It was instead big and glamorous and flashy, all things that are almost completely anathema to Rocky Horror as a piece. Why even DO Rocky Horror if you're going to take out everything that makes it what it is?!?

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered Commenterdenny

I didn't see this and refuse to. "Rocky Horror" was dangerous when it came out and was never meant to be safe for the kiddies and such. I knew they would get this wrong.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSteven

It was a horrible mess- sorry political correct police but casting a transgender woman as Doctor Frank - simply does not work. Nobody could match the brilliant Tim Curry in the role - but by making him clearly a woman it takes a lot of the shock value-( for example the scene with Brad and the Doctor in bed)

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterJaragon

I tried watching it twice (first the east coast feed) - I managed to endure 20 minutes of that. Then, during the west coast feed, caught another 15 minutes or so towards the end. Probably the worst thing I've ever seen on TV. I like the original movie and I like the music, but this was horrible. If it doesn't end Laverne Cox's career, she's lucky. I thought everyone was terrible. If there was a "best of show", it was probably Reeve Carney followed by the female who did the opening song. But both should omit this from their résumés.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterRJL

...sorry political correct police but casting a transgender woman as Doctor Frank - simply does not work.

Actually, the casting was politically incorrect, if you really need to go there.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Outlaw

Ashford stole the show for me. I wonder if Staz Nair uses Nair.

I think Cox was in a lose/lose situation. It's one of the most iconic roles in film history, at least in queer film history, and ain't nobody gonna beat Tim Curry. I think she did an adequate but not amazing job.

October 21, 2016 | Unregistered Commenterjakey

As soon as I saw Rocky wearing loose golden boxer shorts in all the promos, I knew this was a lost cause. Sad to hear it confirmed. I recorded it, but all the reviews make me think I should delete before watching.

October 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterRyan T.

The only performers I could imagine pulling off the role of Dr. FNF today — on television — are Iwan Rheon (about Curry's age at the time) and Alan Cumming (older but still the right kind of fierce). Missed opportunity, Fox.

October 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Outlaw
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.