Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Best Supporting Actor: Is double-dipping the new trend? | Main | My best IMAX Experience »
Thursday
Nov092023

This isn't your mother's "Mean Girls"

by Cláudio Alves

Maybe this trailer deserves the "Yes, No, Maybe So" treatment, but why do all that work when the answer is a resounding NO? Though the musical of Mean Girls isn't an especially well-regarded Broadway property, there was some hope regarding its transfer to the screen. That was before it kept getting delayed until landing on the dumping ground of January 2024. Everything's pointing to it being a disaster, and the first trailer only accentuates those doubts rather than dispelling them. And no, it's not just because it's so eager to make the original audience for Tina Fey's teen comedy feel as old as Methuselah…

What rankles most isn't even that shady tagline. Instead, it's the way the trailer exudes shame from every metaphorical pore, as if it's preemptively apologizing for being a musical. Like Wonka before it, Mean Girls pretends to be a straight comedy with little in the ways of song and dance. There are some flashes of the latter, hidden in plain sight by quick cutting, but none of the former. Indeed, they didn't even bother using one of the musical's songs as underscore, going with an Olivia Rodrigo tune. Now, it's true that the Mean Girls repertoire isn't very deep, but "Meet the Plastics," "Revenge Party," or "World Burn" feel fit for these commercial purposes. 

If the people promoting a movie lack such trust in what they're selling, why should a viewer believe it's worth their time? Moreover, obfuscating the picture's musicality makes the entire exercise look even more redundant than it already is. With costumes, lines, and even Tina Fey's presence lifted wholesale from the 2004 hit, this comes off as a remake with little to offer other than some Gen Z-targeted modernizations. Well, at least there's that shot of Jon Hamm in gym teacher drag talking about choking, so not everything's hopeless. Still, that's not enough. It can't be enough. As audiences, we deserve more.

Do you agree, or are you more optimistic about the Mean Girls movie musical?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

I hate that they turn every single movie into a terrible musical. Modern musicals just aren't good.

That aside, this looks horrible. Like a lesser version in every way. Also, the fact that they seem to be hiding its a musical is confusing. Isn't that the whole point?

November 9, 2023 | Registered CommenterSad Man

I have no interest in this. Aside from Tina Fey, Tim Meadows, and Angourie Rice. This isn't going to be good.

November 9, 2023 | Registered Commenterthevoid99

As said in the first seconds of the trailer: HELL NO!

November 10, 2023 | Registered CommenterAntônio

I wonder if the SAG-AFTRA strike meant that they hadn't finished mixing the recordings of the music for the movie yet so they didn't have anything to show off in the trailer.

November 10, 2023 | Registered Commenterchasgoose
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.