Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!
Comment Fun

Months of Meryl: THE RIVER WILD

"Great post and comments. Yes, Streep had to navigate the rough waters of being in her 40's! I do think she smashed through the glass ceiling for women since she persevered and then became an even bigger star in her 50's." - Sister Rona

"One of my favourite movies from my teen years - I'm shocked at how long ago this was released. It was Meryl that sold this movie for me and is the reason I saw it. At the time, and I still feel this way, she is the reason to watch and believe this film." -Filmboymichael

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 470 Patron SaintsIf you read us daily, please be one.  Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience


What'cha Looking For?
« NYFF: Like Father, Like Son, Like Excellent | Main | My Baby's Got (Another) Secret »

Introducing... Five Nominees From 1980

I've always been interested in the way characters / stars are introduced within their films. Sometimes you can feel the filmmaking underlining the moment: look here, you will love this character! Other times intros are nonchalant and the character sneaks up on you.

The Supporting Actress Nominees of 1980 ~ The Introductions

Last month I ranked the 1952 nominees by the quality of their entrances in preparation for their month-end "Smackdown". This month for the 1980 theme, to mix it up, let's just view them in order of when they show up in their movies. When moviegoers were first seeing these movies back in 1980, what did these characters promise them when they walked into the plot, already in progress?

Cathy Moriarty as "Vicki" in Raging Bull
[17 minutes until 'who's that girl'?]

Jake: Who's that girl you were just talking to.
Joey: The friend of mine I was just talking to? The blonde? Vicki.
Jake: Where's she from?
Joey: She's from the neighborhood. She's a neighbor.
Jake: What's her last name?
Joey: Vicki that's all I know. 

 We see a series of fetching closeup glimpses of Cathy Moriarty from Jake's point of view but she gets no dialogue of her own in this debut scene within her film debut. She's just an object of desire for now. She looks pleased with herself in the series of closeups Scorsese lavishes on her face and body by the pool as the dialogue from two sets of men is all about her or taking out the other men who want her. She's only 15 (Moriarty was 20) but Jake asks what her last name is, a fitting detail since he'll soon her give his own and since he's already married.

The promise here is trouble and Raging Bull has plenty of that.

Mary Steenburgen as "Lynda Dummar" in Melvin & Howard
[20 minutes in...]

Our first images of Linda are blocked by her husband Melvin who is arriving to bed late (or early since it's morning) after the film's lengthy prologue in which he meets Howard Hughes (Jason Robards in an Oscar nominated cameo) but soon he's asleep and she's waking up (on the opposite side of the bed... some nookie offscreen obviously). Noises outside have woken her and serve as another reminder of their poverty.

Oh no. Repossessed again."

She packs her bags in a rush to leave her bad luck husband. This character intro promises a sensual woman with an unlikely combination of flighty and sensible impulses and that's just the kind of memorable character we get. Of course she doesn't stay away too long since she is the film's Supporting Actress Nominee. 

Eileen Brennan as "Capt. Doreen Lewis " in Private Benjamin
[23 minutes... on the dot] 

Private Benjamin knows what it's got in Eileen Brennan's deliciously bitchy and funny Army captain and makes sure you know it too, introducing her in military style. Her entrance is shouted, saluted, and she's even blocked from view theatrically until the introducing officer steps aside to reveal her, the frown on her face mysteriously reading as a self satisfied smirk before she's even started mocking her new recruits. Which she does the first chance she gets two beats later when she sees one of them crying. 

What's the madduhr? Are yoo a widdle cwybaby?"

This entrance promises combative comedy to come and Brennan delivers. 

Eva Le Gallienne as "Grandma Pearl" in Resurrection
[23 ½ minutes]

Let me have a look at you, child!"

The legendary stage actress first appears in longshot racing out of her home to greet her granddaughter Edna (Best Actress nominee Ellen Burstyn), now disabled, who is returning to the family home to heal... in more ways than one. This first scene is as modest as the home, and tells you little about "Grams" other than that she's glad to see Edna. They then look at an old scrapbook together. Eva's voice is a marvel though, instantly betraying her stage origins, full of warmth, feeling and memory. (That's all I know for now. I'm still in the process of watching this which I have to say has been painful. Not, I hasten to add, because the movie is bad but because it's so very hard to find a good copy of it. The versions on YouTube are blurry and blown out and no other downloads seem to function well. Such a pity how Hollywood ignores its own history and lets it go unrestored, even when it's in the history books as an Oscar nominated film.)

Diana Scarwid as "Louise" in Inside Moves
[38 minutes late to the party]

Where are my four beers?"

Diana's waitress "Louise" is introduced so casually, in medium shot and profile before quickly whisking by the camera and vanishing again, that if you didn't know who Diana Scarwid is, you'd think nothing of it. The film's lasting claim to fame just wandered into frame and the movie didn't notice. Inside Moves, a strangely executed film about disabled men who form tight bonds at a local bar until one of them leaves to become a professional athlete (don't ask), doesn't even bother to introduce us. We only infer she's the new waitress from the casual concern in the bosses voice "you doin' ok?" Slowly she becomes more prominent in the narrative and eventually begins to slip out of longshots and into her own closeups. It mirrors the way that loved ones start out as strangers, sure, but it's also kind of anti-dramatic and it's a long wait to get to the Scarwid Goods.

Have you seen any of these films? There is still time to vote. We include reader votes in the Smackdown totals so send in your ballot, rating only the performances you've seen, with or without commentary, on a scale of 1 to 5 (best) hearts.  The Smackdown will take place on Monday, September 30th

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

Just sent my ballot!

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterAndrew

I so agree-an Oscar nomination should guarantee preservation. I've never understood why this isn't a bigger deal for the studios-don't you want to protect your legacy, particularly with the myriad viewing possibilities at filmgoers disposal nowadays-a strong film library filled with unique titles should be valued.

And at the very least, AMPAS should use some of its collective fundraising weight to ensure every film that has ever been nominated for an Oscar is able to be viewed by the public. What's the point in honoring films if no one can see them?

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJohn T

Nathan, just sent my ballot. Without seeing Scarwid's performance, I do think the Academy picked the right actor.

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterbrookesboy

No they picked the wrong one,Eva for the win,just watch her goodbye clip on Youtube..

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered Commentermark

brookesboy & mark -- judging on the ballots i've already seen , looks like there is plenty of disagreement this month. which is healthy!

john t -- right? it seems like such a waste of all that effort every season if you're only a footnote and the nomination means only something to the person it was for and no one else in 10 years time, you know?

andrew -- thanks andrew. it turns out that 1980 is not as popular as '52... but i guess i should have figured.

September 25, 2013 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Nathaniel, I bought a 'gently used' copy of Resurrection through Ebay. I realize time is short, but I could mail it to you so you can watch a non-YouTube version of it.

And while I still need to see Melvin and Howard (damn thing wasn't available through Netflix when it came up, so I already have Rachel Rachel for the next smackdown), Eva is my current #1, followed by Scarwind. Interesting collection of movies for this year.

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterPoliVamp

Resurrection is a deeply moving film. LeGalienne's farewell to her grandchild is heart wrenching and the final sequence moved me to tears then, and would do it again if I could watch it,

September 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMarcos

Just discovered the Smackdown--what a blast!!

I've seen all the nominees for 1980's Supporting Actress Oscar, and I have to say it's a very difficult choice, since it was a really strong year. Rarely do all of the nominees in any category deserve such acclaim. After much thought, here are my votes:

1. Eileen Brennan (Private Benjamin)
2. Cathy Moriarty (Raging Bull)
3. Mary Steenburgen (Melvin and Howard)
4. Diana Scarwid (Inside Moves)
5. Eva Le Galliene (Resurrection)

Honestly, though, the first three are practically a tie with Scarwid a VERY close second.

September 26, 2013 | Unregistered Commentervladdy

Oddly enough, all one-time nominees (although there is absolutely nothing wrong with that...being nominated only once is a feat and an honor!)

September 26, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterSo Sue

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>