Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

COMMENTS

Oscar Takeaways
12 thoughts from the big night

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Ask Nathaniel | Main | Feud: Bette and Joan "Hagsploitation" »
Monday
Apr102017

Visual Effects & Makeup, the April Foolish Oscar Predix

In looking over the options for this year's visual effects and makeup and hair contenders, one thing is certain: we'll be drowning in sequels come Oscar time. Or at least come 'bake-offs' time when the these two branches whittle down the competition with screenings of clip reels of the work in question.

Some umbrella questions to consider...

  • Can Spider-Man: Homecoming, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, and/or Transformers: The Last Knight reverse the course on their franchises? The last installments of each of those franchises were utterly ignored by Oscar but all three franchises used to yield nominations.
  • Can Logan massage those amazing reviews into a campaign despite the Academy's overall lack of interest in the X-Men franchise? They do have a popular craftsman (Joel Harlow) behind the makeup this time. He's been nominated 3 times in the past 8 years

    Joel Harlow, pictured working on Calisto for LOGAN (2017) already has 3 nominations and a win. 
  • Will Oscar ever fully warm to the Marvel Cinematic Universe like the world at large has? Oscar hasn't shown much interest in superheroes that aren't Batman or Spider-Man (aside from random visual fx nods here and there). This year Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 will try to repeat its Oscar plays from last time (Visual FX & Makeup) but Thor: Ragnarok has an uphill battle (Oscar ignored both previous Thor films)
  • What are we to make of Blade Runner 2049? It's a unique scenario in that the original 1982 film was not well received at the time of its release but did garner two nominations (Art Direction and Visual Effects) that it should have won. Will the sequel feel like borrowed glory or a chance to make amends given the prestigious team behind it?  
  • Will the Star Wars franchise ever miss out on nominations? Nearly all franchises which start out as Oscar favorites do at some point. But no Star Wars film has yet been altogether snubbed. The closest was Revenge of the Sith with the series low of one nomination (curiously that one nod was in a category no other Star Wars film has been nominated in: Makeup). Star Wars films, on average, receive 4 nominations (if you count their special achievement statues as nominations... which you should before some categories existed) 

 

See the new Oscar charts for the first predictions of the year in these two categories.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    We all are using this site daily for better info about visual effects makeup the april foolish oscar predix. Better makeup ways and interesting methods I ever seen here really very impressive.

Reader Comments (6)

It is crazy that the DC cinematic universe managed to win an Oscar (makeup for Suicide Squad) before the Marvel cinematic universe despite Marvel having nearly a ten-year head start and being significantly better liked.

April 10, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterMJS

Prometheus was a visual effects nominee.

As for Blade Runner 2049... I can just as easily see it being a Tron Legacy as I can a Mad Max Fury Road. I honestly reckon Deakins could finally win for this even if it falls somewhere closer to Tron.

April 10, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterGlenn

Alien Covenant.

April 11, 2017 | Unregistered Commentermarkgordon

The problem with the Marvel CU for makeup is the sameness of the design at this point. For the most parts, the villains have that mopey smeared black eye design and maybe some non-human colorization; it's boring. It was boring the first time they did it and it's even worse now. I love the Thor series and was so excited to see Cate Blanchett do a Marvel movie and they do her dirty by giving her generic villain in a Marvel movie eye makeup and costuming.

I really thought Deadpool would have shaken up expectations enough to get them a makeup nomination but I was wrong. Logan has old age makeup and mutant makeup, which could be enough to get it in the mix. The Academy loves a good old age makeup right now.

April 11, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterRobert G

Annihilation was moved to 2018, unfortunately.

April 11, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne

I always feel weird on this site talking about Superhero films,it's like so against the Actress obsession this site's about,diversity reigns.

April 11, 2017 | Unregistered Commentermarkgordon
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.