Advertisement
Oscar History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of our team as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!
Comment Fun

Comment Du Jour
Beauty Break - Streep on Film Sets

"Love them all! 💕❤️" - Jamie

"That photo from the set of the French Lieutenant's Woman is majestic." - Mareko

 

What'cha Looking For?
Interviews

Emmanuelle Devos (Retrospective)
Nicholas Galitzine (Handsome Devil)
James Ivory (Maurice 4K Restoraton)
Betty Buckley (Split)

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500 Patron Saints!

IF YOU READ THE SITE DAILY, PLEASE BE ONE BY DONATING. 
Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference to The Film Experience in terms of stability and budget to dream bigger. Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Subscribe
« On this Day in history as it relates to the movies... | Main | Swing, Tarzan, Swing! Ch.3: Lex Barker... and Queen Dorothy Dandridge? »
Sunday
May292016

Review: X-Men Apocalypse

This review was originally published in Nathaniel's column at Towleroad

If you experience extreme deja vu at the movie’s this weekend, don’t panic – that’s just how summer movies play. Take X-MEN APOCALYPSE for example. The sixth film in the X-Men franchise will feel very familiar if you’ve seen any X-pictures before. And maybe even if you haven’t. So let us begin (again) with a short detour.

Oscar Isaac is the internet’s current boyfriend and an amazing actor and as is required by the law of desire he’s in everything now. He was used sparingly but potently in The Force Awakens last Christmas as dashing pilot Poe Dameron and he’s in theaters again in a much larger role as the big bad of X-Men Apocalypse...

A few scenes into Star Wars: Episode 7 – The Force Awakens we see Oscar strapped to a chair and bleeding. A slender masked bad guy named Kylo Ren is holding him captive and enters his mind using The Force to extract information.

In the first scene of X-Men Episode 6 aka  X-Men Apocalypse we see Oscar strapped to a stone slab and not bleeding (even if you cut him open the wound instantly heals). A hulking ugly bad guy named Apocalypse is holding him captive and enters his body — not like that (!) It’s PG-13 —  using Ancient Rituals / Mutant Powers to extract that healing power. And also to possess his gorgeous body. It turns out Apocalypse has done this many times before and is becoming all powerful.

Are you following? I know it’s confusing but my point is this: If every franchise film would like to tie Oscar Isaac up at the beginning of the movie so that we may forcibly ogle him, this is understandable and aesthetically warranted and we shall forgive all such repetitions.

As it happens, though, this is Oscar Isaac’s last good scene in X-Men Apocalypse because once he’s been possessed, he is transformed into looking just like that ugly villain who possessed him. That last thing you want to do when you hire an “it” actor is to bury their beautiful mug in inexpressive latex. You’re only hurting yourself, movie!

After that prologue there’s a popcorn fun credit sequence that speeds through key moments in history, albeit slightly altered to include mutants (which might remind you of the alternate history credits sequence of another superhero movie called Watchmen from 2009), to bring us up to date.

Sophie Turner, Kodi Smit-McPhee and Tye Sheridan have taken over the roles of Jean Grey, Nightcrawler, and Cyclops

Up to date in this case is the 1980s. We know this because the movie tells us and also because Nightcrawler is wearing Michael Jackson’s Thriller jacket and Jean Grey and Cyclops are going to see Return of the Jedi in movie theaters.

Other things that happen in the movie, you’ll remember from previous X-Men movies: The bad guy tries to use Xavier’s mutant locating machine Cerebro to kill everyone, Wolverine has a berserker rage, the X-Men find Nightcrawler and bring him to Xavier’s school, and the movie drops hints that Jean Grey’s powers are growing and she’ll soon be the far more dangerous Dark Phoenix ALL of which also happened in X2 back in 2003.

Quicksilver gets a crowd-pleasing complete song sequence to super speed around in while the world is frozen, Mystique can’t quite believe people love her in her natural blue form, and Xavier tries to convince Magneto that he has good inside him ‘so, like, please stop killing people!’  as we previously saw in X-Men First Class in 2011 and/or  X-Men Days of Future Past in 2014.

And director Bryan Singer is still trying to use the mutant struggle as an allegory for civil rights while awkwardly showing a complete lack of interest in diversity (unless you count blue people) and wasting Storm yet again. She’s a hugely important and fan beloved character in the comic books and six movies in she’s still completely disposable.

The “new” plot is super complicated but boils down to this sentence: Apocalypse reemerges, enlists flipflopping hero/villain Magneto to help him, and will destroy the world unless the X-Men can stop him.

Honest highly-agitated question: Why do they keep making the same movie about, essentially, the same four characters (Magneto, Professor Xavier, Mystique, and Wolverine… who mercifully sits most of this one out) when there are years and years of printed material to work with and multiple fascinating characters to explore from a book that’s always featured a truly diverse ensemble and never been primarily about three white men and their blue lady?

In the 7th film, as hinted by this movie’s finale, it looks like the franchise will reexplore the “Dark Phoenix” saga which they already botched in X-Men: The Last Stand in 2006.

My mutant power is apparently being a killjoy. It’s not that X-Men Apocalypse isn’t fun in spots. It has its big colorful spectacle moments. And some of the visuals are so outlandish that they’re at least as memorable as they are silly.

 

But it’s also uninspired, largely incoherent, has a dull all-powerful villain with dumb looking powers (something about killing people with sand?) and is entirely weightless in its overreach (Oh, the world is ending again? *shrug*) probably because it’s not grounded with careful characterizations or any consistency beyond repetition.

Thanks to Marvel Studios (who do not control the X-Men films since the rights were sold to Fox years ago) the superhero genre has changed a lot since the X-Men first got the big screen treatment in 2000.

The genre now features very tightly developed characterizations (see the Captain America films), drama with an eye on the long game, complex action sequences that extend way beyond CGI beams crashing into each other, regular introductions of new heroes to play with (Guardians of the Galaxy, the ever expanding Avengers team, and Doctor Strange this November) and stays mostly true to the various source materials in terms of character, powers, tone, and general guiding principles.

By contrast X-Men Apocalypse feels like it was made before the superhero boom. It’s the one super-franchise that’s frozen in time, and not just because they yelled “do-over” by traveling backwards in it.

Grade:
Oscar Chances: Perhaps in Visual Effects. Days of Future Past (2014) was the first X-Men film to receive an Oscar nomination (for visual effects) but I'm doubtful that this one will follow suit, largely because it looks like another competitive year for the category and these effects don't always feel "fresh".

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

You could have joked "in this case, as in that, we're in the 80s, but three years earlier."

May 29, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

To be fair, this trilogy was about Magneto, Xavier and Mystique, so this one would have had to be about them anyway. In saying that, the film doesn't really have a central character and, unfortunately, that became one of the film's biggest problems: There's no one to solidify the narrative.

The X-kids are all good but they're not the main focus; most of the returning main actors are strong but they're not one hundred percent the focus either; and quite a few of the other actors - returning and new - aren't given much to do. I will say, however, that I didn't mind Isaac as Apocalypse. He definitely gets more theatrical as he goes along but I thought that actually worked... most of the time.

In terms of the story, I thought the first half worked pretty well but from the X-Masion explosion until the end is where things get messy. I admire Singer for trying to make a more bombastic and over-the-top X-Men film than he's used to making but it does leave the film unbalanced. Overall, though, I enjoyed the film quite a bit. Unfortunately, it's the weakest film of the X-Men Prequel Trilogy - and Singer's weakest X-Men film in general - by a considerable margin.

May 29, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Armour

That having been said: It really says something about what the failures of this franchise are that, allowing spin-offs to be in the ranking, the Deadpool movie is almost certainly the second strongest of the nine (1. X2, 2. Deadpool, 3. First Class, 4. X-Men, 5. Days of Future Past, 6. The Wolverine, 7. Apocalypse, 8. X3, 9. Origins: Wolverine.) so far released.

May 29, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

How is Jennifer Lawrence's performance? Another Oscar nomination?

May 30, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterMay Bell

That list gif is delicious. Total Madeline Ashton LOL

May 30, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterJono

I saw it yesterday and would agree with Volvagia's lineup (maybe interchange The Wolverine with Apocalypse), but overall liked it. I will say Sophie Turner was great as young Jean Grey and Quicksilver continues to be entertaining. Yet almost every other character seemed undeserved (wtf about introducing Jubilee and not letting her do anything). J Law seemed over it and noticeably rarely put on the blue makeup this time around (even if the script called for it). I will say they gave Storm the most plot development ever in the series, yet it still wasn't enough but good casting though. The reviews I've read seem to be a bit too harsh on the movie, yet everything I've read about the wasting of Isaac in the film is spot on. The only thing I'd really quibble with is how confusing it is to figure out which timeline is which. Teenage Scott Summers was introduced in Origins: Wolverine but now is a teenager here. Adult Jean Grey meets Wolverine in the original film but is a teenager meeting him this time. Which is it?

May 30, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterJames

Ugh, it's so flat. Magneto *again* being drawn to the darkside and saved by speaking to his true humanity? Apparently forgiven despite murdering a million or more people (Egypt is literally dust now and NYC is partially destroyed as well as the eight soldiers that begin his outrage). Jennifer Lawrence not giving a damn. Ditching Jubilee somewhere along the way because, ew, gross, an Asian character who we've never really seen on screen before. All the exact same characters. The weird relationship to time - how have these people aged 20 years from FIRST CLASS and yet all look the exact same? Ugh. That third act is a mess. An ugly mess.

Give me a Quicksilver spin-off movie and I will be there, though. Yet again the best thing about this movie.

May 31, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterGlenn Dunks

James - X-Men: Origins - Wolverine got completely erased from the timeline after Days Of Future's Past. In fact, this timeline with the younger people is an alternate one now... I think?

June 1, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Armour

X Men franchise is always a guarantee of entertainment...not this time. The movie is dull, predictable and lack action. I agree that the X Men movies should be rethought.

August 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterMr Charles

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>