Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« "Best Shot" Choices from 'Nightmare Alley' | Main | Yes No Maybe So: Baz Luhrmann's 'ELVIS' »
Thursday
Feb172022

Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Nightmare Alley (2021)

Welcome back to the series, "Hit Me With Your Best Shot" by Nathaniel R. Each week we'll discuss a single movie via a particular shot. Anyone who'd like to participate can choose their own!

Best Prop

When you're reading your mark, as former circus psychic Pete (David Strathairn) teaches us, you're searching for external clues to internal damage. The fatal flaw of Nightmare Alley, up this year for Best Picture, may well be that Guillermo del Toro, though a gifted filmmaker, isn't much for interiority. But oh his surfaces! Overly lacquered beauty and the ugly rot it's faililng to hide are the greatest assets of his latest film. On that note we must pause to honor the funhouse sequence early in the film which operates like a veritable FYC ad for the Oscar-nominated Production Design. The set amazes and one particular prop in the 'funhouse', a mirror stating "TAKE A LOOK AT YOURSELF  SINNER" is a perfect offhand joke. We know very little about Stanton Carlisle (Bradley Cooper) but he already knows he's "no good". The camera lingers for a second on the mirror, to make sure we do... 

The first act of the film, in which Carlisle joins the circus and learns a "mentalism" act from Zeena (Toni Collette) and Pete (David Strathairn) is strangely rushed given that the Nightmare Alley is a full 40 minutes longer than the '47 noir (inspired by the same novel) despite adding little in the way of plot, characters, or cumulative emotional nihilism. That's a pity since del Toro's heart is most at home with the low-rent circus freaks, their rituals, lingo, superstitions, fetish objects, and soggy rotting lives. It is always raining and no one is ever dry for long. The big tent is their only umbrella.

In the second and third act, the precipitation continues, but turns entirely to snow as if the movie's heart has frozen over. Once Stanton leaves the circus to take his place in more reputable, yet tellingly more rotten circles, Nightmare Alley loses some of its visual mystique. Apart, of course, from what should be -- but isn't remotely due the overextended running time -- the film's centerpiece; Stanton meeting his match in Dr Lilith Ritter (Cate Blanchett). 

Best Mic Drop (and runner up Best Shot)

In round one of their duel, exquisitely lit for maximum theatricality and impenetrable glamour by cinematographer Dan Laustsen, this femme fatale psychiatrist attempts to throw the mentalist off his game. She throws him a question that she knows his assistant (Rooney Mara, wasted/miscast) can't help him with. But Stanton passes her test. In one beautiful bit of blocking, direction, lighting, and performance, Stanton pivots fully around to show the crowd Lilith's hidden pistol -- a literal Chekhov's gun! -- that he's correctly "seen" with his mental powers. He's backlit and soaking up both the light and the awe from the rapt audience. Lilith remains utterly frozen in profile, like a glamorous gargoyle recently sprung from her stone perch. What is she thinking? Is she humiliated...surprised...reassessing? Perhaps she's waiting patiently waiting for the mouse to move again before pouncing.

Lilith's introduction is the film's most riveting and purposefully gorgeous sequence. It's also where del Toro's gift for surface visuals pays the strongest dividends. Pete taught us that people are "desperate to tell you who they are, desperate to be seen" but he has never met Lilith and he's misread Stanton. We're not meant to be able to peer into their souls only to know that we shouldn't. Even in this strongly lit room, they're unknowable, untrustworthy, bathed in shadow.

But for our Best Shot, which does not always mean Most Beautiful, we return to that eternal downpour that follows the circus folk around like a manifest storm.

BEST SHOT

Don't pretend like you give a shit!

In this brief sequence, circus manager Clem (Willem Dafoe) and Stanton are dropping a dying "geek" (junkie) they've enslaved off at some sort of charitable home or hospital in some, well, nightmarish alley. This scene is easy to miss or undervalue the first time through the movie but on the second it pops. As their car turns the corner, a neon cross with "Jesus Saves" written on it begins to flicker and the light goes out on the Son of God; "Jesus" departs the scene for good. No more flickering.

Stanton rings the bell and assumes they'll wait for the good Samaritans to answer but Clem runs away and then chides the younger man for lingering with the body. Though this is a rare moment where Stanton appears to have a soul and a moral impulse, the sickly blue-green visuals paint him in a different light. This could just as easily be a shot of a vampire, huddled over its expiring prey. The now godless cross behind the men is reduced to a pop of garish color.

The men run off, escaping the consequences of their heinous crime. But is it the geek that died in the alley or the last glimpse of Stanton's soul? His damnation is swift. Minutes late he's gone full blaspheming predator, mocking a cop's religious beliefs and using his mother "Mary" against him. The hospital drop-off might have been a deleted scene it plays so briefly and in such an unassuming way. Instead it's a stake right through the film's heart. 

ALL THE "BEST SHOT" CHOICES FROM THOSE THAT PLAYED ALONG...

NEXT WEEK'S FILM: Douglas Sirk's influential melodrama All That Heaven Allows (1955) starring Rock Hudson & Jane Wyman. It's currently streaming on Criterion Channel and available for rental on other services. It's only 89 minutes long so please join us Thursday February 24th by posting your own "Best Shot". We'll link up if you let us know you did.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

no comments? Ouch

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

This was a pleasure to read. It's long been one of my favorite TFE series, but Hit Me With Your Best Shot is a great way to delve into a movie's visual construction and how shots function. Love your choice, though it wasn't even among my list of finalists.

I also find it interesting how our lukewarm reactions to the flick diverge on the same point. I wish del Toro and company had leaned even more on surfaces as the raison d'etre of the picture rather than attempted psychology. Rather than wanting interiority, I wanted the reverse - the total obliteration of it in the face of glamour and grotesque, so much so that the film becomes an overt study on fakery.

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterCláudio Alves

I hadn't thought of that moment as the bisection point in this clearly cleaved movie, but it makes sense. And the cross even exists between the two figures - between the empathy he's about to leave behind as he becomes more like Dafoe.

I find it interesting that it's told in this way, since the typical thing to do would be to start in the 2nd part, and show bits and pieces of the first half in flashback. Shows what a classicist Del Toro is, and I basically appreciate it.
I love how much the shots selected by you and your participants tell the movie.

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterMike in Canada

Great choice - definitely an easy one to miss on first viewing! These shots are really making me realize how NA got that cinematography nod. Wouldn't make my ballot but it is very impressive work

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterGreg F

Did not care for the movie, but loved the cinematography.

February 18, 2022 | Registered Commenterrdf

Claudio -- well, dont get me wrong. I think Del Toro would be much better at making the fascinating movie you're describing! I just dont think that's the movie he wanted to make. So given that he wanted interiority, i think he needs to figure out a way to get there.

Mike -- about the cleaved in two thing. the screenplay has so many good elements that it's kind of a wonder that both he and his co-screenwriter didn't realize how lopsided they were making the movie by not following through with that. (also i HATE the modern lazy thing of start at the climax and work back to see how we got there It's so normalized now -- i think this started in full force in the Aughts in terms of basically everyone doing it -- that it's shocking when tv (especially) doesn't do it that way.

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Yeah, interiority is not what this film is selling (which is a waste of Rooney Mara), but I do love its surfaces.

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterFrank Zappa

Great choice and interpretation, Nathaniel. I didn't love the movie, especially seeing it right after seeing the 1947 version, but moments like this hint that there's a great film buried in here, or at least the raw materials of one.

GDT seems to have a thing for that sickly green or bluish-green hues. They're all over this film and Shape of Water, too.

February 18, 2022 | Registered CommenterLynn Lee
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.