Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

COMMENTS

Oscar Takeaways
12 thoughts from the big night

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Sundance: 'You Won't Be Alone' stirs and shape-shifts | Main | Sundance: 'Mars One' is a Brazilian gem! »
Monday
Jan242022

Sundance: 'Call Jane' is worth answering

By Ben Miller

Handsomely filmed and admirably performed, Oscar-nominated Carol screenwriter Phyllis Nagy makes her feature film directorial debut with Call Jane. Elizabeth Banks stars as Joy, a traditional suburban Chicago housewife in the 1960s. Joy has a loving but busy lawyer husband Will (Chris Messina) and a 14-year-old daughter Charlotte (Grace Edwards). Joy is newly pregnant, and keeps having dizzy spells and passes out in her kitchen. Her doctor diagnoses a congenital heart blockage that threatens her life, unless the pregnancy is terminated - the only treatment...

The hospital board turns down Joy's request for a termination, so she looks for an illegal abortion. After being scared away from a less-reputable establishment, Joy finds a flyer to "Call Jane." Through a phone service, she meets her liaison Gwen (Wunmi Mosaku), doctor Dean (Cory Michael Smith) and Call Jane's leader Virginia (Sigourney Weaver), willing to provide her with a safe, though still illegal, abortion.

Joy becomes enlightened by the Janes and finds herself more and more involved in the organization. As she learns and sees and take action, Joy understands the true measure of inequality for women's rights in the world and in her own life.

Frankly, I was expecting the film to be much more heavy-handed. That's not to say the film takes on both sides of the issue. At one point, Virginia states, "We help women. We don't judge them." It's the film's true rallying cry. Some clients of the Janes are wildly unsympathetic, others are stuck in heartbreaking situations. As the clientele grows, so does the weighing of who gets the procedure. Is it reduced to capitalistic gains, or which situation requires the most immediate attention? How do you weigh need?

Banks appears in almost every scene and nails the tone. She deftly balances the buttoned-up housewife characterization with the dawning realization of her true calling as a radical. She is sympathetic and resourceful, and ratchets up the exasperation when the scene calls for it. Weaver is mostly stuck with exposition, which is needed, but she does have a standout scene with Smith where she reminds the world how sexy and alluring she can be. Wumni is a stand-in for women of color, but her steady anger is more than justified. Her performance is small, but powerful.

The film is cleanly lensed by Greta Zozula, while Oscar-nominated costume designer Julie Weiss (Frida) puts some fantastic outfits on display without drawing attention to herself; it's a historical drama rather than a "costume drama". Nagy has an eye for tension in the procedure scenes. These sequences never feel exploitative or overly intrusive, but they still convey emotion through minor details.  Another standout scene involves Joy's run-in with a police officer (John Magaro), which raises the tension to the film's highest point  but also subverts expectations.

Though somewhat formulaic, Call Jane is a great start for Nagy as a director. The astute, adult filmmaking should serve her well in the future. I can't wait to see what she does next.  B+

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Ben, i'm surprised you didn't like Sigourney Weaver more. I thought she was the standout... even with the dread task of exposition.

January 25, 2022 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

So she's a standout any Oscar chance for Sigourney.

January 25, 2022 | Registered CommenterMr Ripley79

It was classy and the subject matter very important (in today's world especially!), but the film itself was way too dry (lacking the emotional punch) and formulaic to my taste. The actresses were just "ok" level.. and I do like both Elizabeth and Sigourney... but here.. and let's be frank - nothing special... I didn't see any oscar potential (at most for art department... but I strongly doubt it).
This was the film I anticipated the most this year (mostly because it is Carol's screenwriter directing here after all!) and that might also be the reason I could rate it no higher than B-

January 25, 2022 | Registered CommenterKris
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.